"Conductor"
 

Good day,


Please help identify the author /evaluate


"Conductor"

securities /sm.tehnika,

38h26


Here's a related picture:

I think these things neatributiruemy.

(If only back there different autographs, stamps and Protsch good, which would be a help, but also not a fact, it is).

the other side

Picture perfect.

Chemical analysis of a paper, and if it is confirmed that the 20 - 30 years can badsome sell.

Judging by the architectural fragments on the back, probably 30-50 years.

I also noticed arhitikturny fragment dating to almost agree, but you never know.

And this is for what?

I think $ 500 or more.

Well , well , and make the style of hi-tech that will suit .
Passepartout wider, poizyumistey , frame with square corners with black anthracite hue ... but still, preferably several such drawings , three pieces for example , to achieve a visual harmony .

Yes, it does

 
:D>

No 500, and - from five, and up to infinity ;)>

That is strange.

Rather, drawing made on the arch.
drawing, and not vice versa.

And in the 1930s, so, in effect, no one drew.

So drawn, perhaps, later, much later.