L.N.Vinogradov
 

Hello!
Dear friends, please help in the attribution and evaluation of a picture:
A Vinogradov , the size of 92cm * 129sm , oil on canvas , in a baguette !

Leonid Vinogradov (born 1938 , Kostroma region). Honored Artist of the RSFSR ( 1991). He studied at the Kostroma Art School from 1956 to 1961 in AP Whites. By paintings, landscapes NONCHERNOZEM edge. Adhered to the traditions of Russian realistic landscape , achieving fusion genre and landscape began. Member of the Union of Artists since 1970 Since 1968, an active participant in regional, republican and all-Union art exhibitions ....

"+" "-" $ 1000 and will sell is not easy.

True signature to most works sold at auction - another.

so to speak based on Levitan :)>


powerful public relations at the local level and a thread money guy take his office or cafe to entourage


agrees with the assessment - 30 000 45 000 maximum

By LN Vinogradova in the capital are well represented -
for example, or here and a here, etc.

Yes , Vinogradova in the capital a lot. But I'm not sure this is the same artist. More, of course , I am embarrassed by painting: it is too sleek , flat compared to what we have . More like linoleum .
The second point: the signature. Characteristic. In base 65 works L.N.Vinogradova AI , but , in my opinion , there is not one with a signature. L.N.Vinogradov not stress (in both senses) of his signature , and the present work it is - bright red, polished, " done." The best, in my opinion , to try to contact the author . This is probably not prohibitively difficult. Maybe there is a gallery in the city of Kostroma. In general, in the directory specified phone CX :)>

If this is indeed L.N.Vinogradov from Kostroma ( ie if I 'm wrong), then it will be confirmed by the author of the signature option . If not - excess error in the attribution can be avoided. Of course , this is not done in 5 minutes , but, in my opinion , the time is not spent in vain . Good luck , Edward!

Thank you all responded. I understand that first we must verify the signature of the author, I will seek to coordinate communication (help is welcome))). If a signature confirming everything falls into place, if not, then who is this Vinogradov? I do not think that someone signed his name, though ... . Maybe it makes sense to make examination (if comparable) for the job? Prompt value of the service, and who can help with the examination?

I alone seem to sign over craquelure?

Or is it a lack of sleep in my eyes dazzled?

No, not you alone.
:)>

No, not dazzled.
:)> Paint signature really covers craquelure.

signature
 

What does that mean ? Absolutely - nothing! I come to the author, asking him to sign the work, and the work of 50 years! Of course, the paint on the sign will glow in the ultra- violet , as the difference in 50 years!
In this case, to determine the authorship of a photo - a host that up to 100%authenticity. Is there a practice on this " Forum" ? " Commentator"
- In excess of sales - 0.3%, the future of this world -?

Of course, it is not. " The paint on the sign will glow in ultra- violet ", as you say , not because " the difference in 50 years." :)> Because this signature will lie on top of the cover coat. And excite under the influence of ultra- violet varnish coated and uncoated areas of painting will be completely different. And the author is after applying signatures to cover all the colorful surface of another layer of varnish, as the signature immediately stop "light."
Besides , it was not about the UV luminescence , but only of craquelure , and even (according to the characteristic features ) - Technology . That is why no one here this late signature seriously and discussed. :)>

And me and craquelure seems artificial.

Edward, IMHO it's not Kostroma Vinogradov.

- Contact Members Maskit http://forum.artinvestment.ru/member.php?u=344791
Have gone through a lot of work Vinogradov. He was doing his album. Naturally very familiar with both the artist and his paintings of different periods.

- See forum member Alexander Lyudmirskomu
I know he knows the artist and also did his exhibition
This is his report of the sale of the work of Vinogradov
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=121533

Well, not in Kostroma is you go .... Ineta the artist can not be ...
Examination did not pay off. He ( Kostroma Vinogradov), the money is not worth it when it makes sense to do.

There's not only that, but also the craquelure some strange, it's too " same " ...
And then it was a natural number can not be on hardboard , especially in the " cloth " side. Painting itself does not look like it is too inert, and the composition of the landscape in this website is always more complex, and blue ... ?
More add - Size hardboard too big for a sketch, and the wizard did a lot of work on the canvas.

Craquelure natural as it can be artificial?)))

As for the signature on top of craquelure, arm the tool and will update!

There are technologies "manufacturing" craquelure.