Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Sell (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=176)
-   -   Продам: K.Kryzhitsky sale now (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=177122)

Felizzia 10.11.2012 20:54

K.Kryzhitsky sale now
 
Вложений: 4
Selling picture K.Kryzhitskogo with posthumous exhibition of the artist in the original frame.
Size 15 * 22 cm , wood.
The back side of the right stamp with the text, confirming that the work was exhibited in a posthumous exhibition of KY Kryzhitsky in the halls of the IAH in 1911, the stamp bears the signature of the head of the artist exhibition NG Tsirigotti certified signature Clerk Ivanova . Has a red wax seal IAH

Кирилл Сызранский 10.11.2012 22:09

Цитата:

Сообщение от Felizzia (Сообщение 2334141)
Buy now K.Kryzhitskogo a posthumous exhibition of the artist in the original frame.

That's right in that same frame and exposed the landscape to a posthumous exhibition of Konstantin Yakovlevich Kryzhitsky " in the halls of IAH "?

Дилетант 10.11.2012 23:01

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2334191"
What a bitter irony, the same day on the forum appear Kryzhitsky and Brewery ( if you remember the first cause of suicide ), and both ... questionable, so to speak.

Kirill presented landscape Kryzhitsky the slightest doubt about the authenticity is not called. Already before the typical - typical nowhere. One of the numerous field studies, written in a fun thorns. ( Zacherene , Ramon and Gay Turn - favorite places KY ) and is present in the catalog , by the way :)>.
Yes, and " Brewery " is also certainly not "questionable ." Is certainly not Brewery .
Something like that.

Felizzia 10.11.2012 23:03

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran (Сообщение 2334191)
That's right in that same frame and exposed the landscape to a posthumous exhibition of Konstantin Yakovlevich Kryzhitsky " in the halls of IAH "? :D>

What a bitter irony, the same day on the forum appear Kryzhitsky and Brewery ( if you remember the first cause of suicide ), and both ... questionable, so to speak.

In this frame the landscape hanging in my house about 100 years. Do not know which frame it was exposed , with or without frames. Apparently , you had to write that the frame - not a remake .

Sorry, did not realize to what the word "questionable "?

Кирилл Сызранский 10.11.2012 23:07

Цитата:

Сообщение от Felizzia (Сообщение 2334301)
Sorry, did not realize to what the word "questionable"?

The word "questionable" are proposed here and Kryzhitsky Brovar here.

Добавлено через 7 минут
Цитата:

Сообщение от Dilettante , 2334291"
Kirill presented landscape Kryzhitsky the slightest doubt about the authenticity is not called.

I called , I'm sorry , what wrote.
I'm certainly not an expert on Kryzhitsky saw his stuff in albums but only in museums, for example , that the landscape "Beach " in 1886 ( h /m, 45h64 ) here in Samara :

Кирилл Сызранский 10.11.2012 23:15

Вложений: 1
Цитата:

Сообщение от Dilettante , 2334291"
Kirill presented landscape Kryzhitsky the slightest doubt about the authenticity is not called.

I called , I'm sorry , what wrote.
I'm certainly not an expert on Kryzhitsky saw his stuff in albums but only in museums, for example , that the landscape "Beach " in 1886 ( h /m, 45h64 ) here in Samara :

Felizzia 10.11.2012 23:17

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran (Сообщение 2334321)
Word "questionable" are proposed here and Kryzhitsky Brovar by reference.

If something is confusing, let us know what their concerns publicly and justify.

For Brovar not answer - not mine.

Кирилл Сызранский 10.11.2012 23:25

Цитата:

Сообщение от Felizzia; 2334361"
If something is confusing, let us know what their concerns publicly and justify .

But why? Just about everything without me said - " This landscape Kryzhitsky the slightest doubt about the authenticity is not called ".
I base my doubts on previously seen Kryzhitsky things and experiences with experts in Grabar, which carried the same thing as it turned out later, " supposed Kryzhitsky ".
But, apparently, see reference things of this artist is not enough to doubt the authenticity of your sketch .

Дилетант 10.11.2012 23:28

Вложений: 1
Цитата:

Сообщение от Felizzia; 2334301"
Sorry, did not realize to what the word "questionable "?

To what that word does not apply , do not worry, please :)>
To repeat, a good sketch Kryzhitsky 1890 . AtvEchayu !
Here's another essay , written in the same name (and exhibited at the same show .) As for the box, so I do not show this very clearly remember ...

Кирилл Сызранский 10.11.2012 23:30

Цитата:

Сообщение от Dilettante, 2334391
Here is another study

I'm sorry, and you compare that's this study with a proposal to sell here?

Борис Кон 10.11.2012 23:34

Doubt Cyril is empty.

Сергей Мельников 10.11.2012 23:43

Kryzhitsky
 
good night,

1. Picture this size can hardly be called rather sketch.
2. And then the frame, if you are selling sketch ?
3. Determine the authenticity of the photos on the internet - is a "super ", I think that neither the Tretyakov or Grabar would not go on like that.
4. Aivazovsky, Clover , Brovary, Kryzhitsky etc. forged in life (for some news? ).
5. Why not offer up for auction ? Gelos , Mangum ARS , Cabinet , shovels,
Shishkin Gallery , etc.

Sincerely,
Sergei

Дилетант 10.11.2012 23:54

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2334351"
I'm certainly not an expert on Kryzhitsky saw his stuff in albums but only in museums, for example , that the landscape "Beach " in 1886 ( h /m, 45h64 ) we in Samara :

It should be very sorry to see that studies K.Ya.Kryzhitskogo (and Voronezh , written in the estate of Grand Duchess Olga Alexandrovna , and zacherenskie and Ternovskii ) in museum collections are hardly represented . But I saw them a couple of dozen at least. In good (mostly - St. Petersburg ), in private collections. I was lucky .
 Incidentally, in the present studies ( which is not bad even seen the photographs of this quality ) flawlessly everything itself marking and signature Clerk V. Ivanov , and the signature " insti dyval schego exhibition" Artists N.Tsirigoti et caetera , et caetera ...

Кирилл Сызранский 11.11.2012 00:01

Вложений: 1
Цитата:

Сообщение от Dilettante , 2334481"
By the way, in the present studies ( which is not bad even seen the photographs of this quality ) flawlessly everything itself marking and signature Clerk V. Ivanov , and the signature " of director of the exhibition" Artist N.Tsirigoti et caetera , et caetera ...

 
Цитата:

On the back of the right stamp with the text, confirming that the work was exhibited in a posthumous exhibition of KY Kryzhitsky in the halls of the IAH in 1911, the stamp bears the signature of the head of the artist exhibition NG Tsirigotti on May 27, 1911 , signed, dated Clerk Ivanova . Bottom - red wax seal IAH. Top left is the number " 317 ." (Numbered 317 on display at the exhibition and published in the exhibition catalog essay "The Stones "). Top left sticker with a number and name : «№ 360 /Stones /Price :».
here . can be compared to
 Perhaps better photos and dispel my doubts, but now they are present, repeat .

Дилетант 11.11.2012 00:04

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran ; 2334401"
I'm sorry, and here you are comparing this study with a proposal to sell here ?

Uh-huh. Compare. And " this one ", and six more available at my disposal (and not such luxury ) Ternovskii studies.
However, this argument seems to me absolutely absurd. If something I do not know for sure - I prefer not to engage in conversation . And so as soon as I say anything definitely , so - to have a good reason. We are closing on this, if you do not mind. :)>


Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 21:06.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot