MA-80! The exhibition in the Central House of Artists
 

Today the CHA opened Anniversary Exhibition of Agriculture.


1.Z.Tsereteli

2,3,4 Tair Salakhov

5.N.Nesterova

Добавлено через 6 минут
6.O.Lang

7.N.Vatagin

8.O.Bulgakova

9.A.Sitnikov

10.M.Dronov

Добавлено через 5 минут
1.V.Razgulin

2.M.Kulagina

3.L.Gadaev

6.O.Lang

7.N.Vatagin

8.O.Bulgakova

9.A.Sitnikov

10.M.Dronov

1.V.Razgulin

2.M.Kulagina

3.L.Gadaev

Photo: last night at the opening of the 80th anniversary of the Moscow Union of Artists in the CHA.

Elnitskiy faith, I, Lucy Voronov, Tanya Ipatenko.
It was, as they say, all of Moscow.


Exhibition a big, rich and very interesting.
The loft-graphics - not all there reached.
I plan to go back and look at everything again.

Today was at the show ... very few people.
The exhibition gives the impression of "painting decadent times" .. Yes, there are masters .. but no Maestro ... Alas.

Peter, unfortunately , masters widely, bold, flamboyant than the youth .
If we are sad , it is not the quality of the painting , there are a lot of very decent, fine , technically painting ( which still life with two porcelain figurines and dark colorful drapery - Konchalovsky resting Cezanne jealous :-) , and that for Salakhov , Tsereteli, Konysheva no artists , coming hot on its heels . Why? Paints , canvases lacking in shops like.

Does anyone know to what number will be an exhibition?

And what a show was in the spring in the Arena?
The same?

On November 20.

The fact that all of the exhibition with the participation of the Ministry of Agriculture this year, timed to the 80th anniversary of the union. (even in the Sermon on our open-air :))
 The exhibition at the Manezh was probably the most significant on the number of jobs. (Yet many sections ) should be planned at the CHA (but a day vystavkoma (as always ), the artist reported lower allocated rooms away and parallel work on the third winter exhibition , also to 80 anniversary, which will be held at the Kuznetsk 11). I thought to give priority to the CHA abstraction names and big size.

Seriy, my usual reaction to your message - Nitsche not understand.

First, in a photo next to you is an artist who with specified men and do not have to compete - at different scales, and the competition (sorry for the sports tone)
respektno with-me-respected N. Konysheva this artist wins outright (well here abs voluntaristic IMHO, of course).

Second, if there is "a lot of fine art and technology" - that what is not "stepping on the heels"?

Third, I noticed that you often generalize his person with broader concepts - such as "All of Moscow." There was the opening of "the whole of Moscow." I know a large number of artists, which is a damn.
(That's me, not for detraction exhibition, and to korrrektnosti lighting issue). I went to an exhibition in an hour after the opening -
there were empty rooms. Artists rubles gained some wine and ran - that "All Moscow".

Fourth - I wonder who you think "masters," and any of "young people" do you know? Once in your post "cultural layer" artists tonkovat and a thought - and a fairly representative sample of whether you make your conclusions?

Sobsno it all to the fact that the Russian painting is alive, artists work, there is a lot to see and who learn.
If someone does not see good pictures (including "bold" and "sweeping") - that's his problem.

Sergey burly, well, and would result in the examples here of talented young people with good paintings in this exhibition, all would have been interesting.
Yes, of course, I know personally a very limited number of artists of the Moscow Union of 6500 of its members, but almost everyone I know, at this show, I met. At the opening there were thousands, how many do not know, but at 16-00 in the lobby could not be practically enter. And parted like only saw all the work, then what to do?
Artist were born in 1936 still life (Thanks for the info nick IV), I also liked Tsereteli. Yes, I like great technical painting, whether it is an abstraction, Cézanne or pikassizm is my personal preference, reaching, perhaps, from my unprofessional in the sense of art education, want to be present in each work and drama, and classic color contrast, and composition plane used fabric and its size, and line drawing singing, and said something, and smear it all in one.
  I express my personal opinion, I could be wrong and mistaken, so with interest and respect for other personal opinion. Only better with pictures.

Seriy, ie Are you sad that it is in no one MOSH each other 's toes does not come? Pechalka art.

As for young people , it is you , the master should be sad about a worthy replacement. Cho I , I " primus mending ."

I wanted to show a couple of words about writing, but in this wonderful context - "the youth ", and - refrain for now.

P.S. Artists, next to whom I photographed:

Vera Elnitskiy - presented a great job, a very Moscow-landscape with a monastery and birch, but not worn out, with a fresh look, in its author's style with an abundance of air, light, with gray, turquoise, light green hues, pasty, mobile, with a twist of smears epic.

Lucy Voronov's work in this exhibition was not present, because, as she explained, is involved in another section of the Moscow Union of Artists.

Tanya Ipatenko presented the big picture, such munkovskuyu, striped, fully self-contained, there is a crucial inside their tasks without communication with the audience (in my opinion). I did not understand what was shown, but it is not an abstraction.
Tanya - a fine artist, an amazing graphic artist, painting nude in one touch, without lifting the pencil from the paper. The exhibition of the Moscow Union of "Worker and Collective Farm" She had dark brown ocher still life-like Monticelli, very good.

Added after 3 minutes
Sergey burly, do not have to abstain, to write about other artists and their work is also the theme of the exhibition of the Moscow Union. But me personally, it is better to write in my topic - Artist Iksigon.
In this exhibition, I did not participate, because I am not a member of the Moscow Union of Artists.

Seriy - and that itself should think artinvestOry ( ay, all gone ! ?) , Reading these lines ?
In the sense of " stepping on the heels " - did so or did not?