D.M.Barkalov, Honored Artist of Russia
 

Oil on canvas.
Oil.
Quality work.
The size of the picture 145 * 190 cm The name "Talking about the earth."

Rate please.

The work, in my opinion, is quite weak . And Hitch a puny , and the background for this format - 1, 5, 2 m - badly registered , and a farmer with a horse on the right belt in something - if they plow the land , there must be a full-length , if half of wheat, then why at the first plowman bare earth ... Remembering VI Lenin, " is far from frightening people," Honored Artist of ...

Lenin was a small rostochka , took mainly intelligence, knew a lot . By the way, when talking about his alleged love affairs , look at his wife, Krupskaya , in her youth and collected works. Just nothing to look better and there is simply no time for it. So VI like all right.

also like to hear opinions on the price

On Lenin ...
   The fact that Lenin was not as powerful starikanom how he was portrayed in the old days , a fairly well known. Just look at the first monument to Lenin, mounted on a square in the town of Glukhov Noginsk ( see internet ).
    Calling Ilyich " puny " I was referring to his image at this picture. Referring to yesterday's discussion of the painting " Lenin at the rally ," it must be admitted that if a painting depicting the VI and interesting to someone now, it is in its " classic " image of the leader of the world proletariat . But such a " spiritual grandfather Lenin " is hardly someone to be interested. IMHO
  And the price , respectively, is small ...

Yet so frail full of worth, at least that's what wanted to hear-

The ideological component of the canvas infinitely dominates the art . Depicted scene is not real, if not absurd. Schematic images to bezobraziya.Istoricheskogo pathos there , "humanity" of the " humane " is not visible - it is far from the plowman and the absurd in his coat, boots and cravat in the middle of arable land.
Blinded by the " genius of the leader " or ideologically perverted thousand rubles will pay 10 , maybe. But no more .

thanks for the view I would like to hear somebody else

( heavily lifted his head from the bowl of hash )
Barkalov Dmitri Mikhailovich, think you ? This is what 11.7.1914 -1987 ?
Who had studied at the Moscow State Art Institute named after VI Surikov in AV Lentulov , AA Osmerkin , I. Chekmazova in 1942 - 1949 years?
On your things after the signature date " 48" ?
I do not think that the author is your thing this is the Barkalov .
One well-known artist and good, for me, by the way, it is a wonderful thing .

Dmitry M. - private owner exhibitions since 1949 . His works are in the Museum of A. Suvorov in St. Petersburg , Irkutsk Regional Museum , Irkutsk Regional Art Museum .

He is, I looked at his other work, his style took work in his native district in the collective buzulkskom gk, so no doubt yes and no neprosit what that fabulous money so its fake

About a fake conversation and not just be other artists by the name of Barkalov . No?
And where does the Samara region ?
Yes, he was born in c. Bor , but he lived after the Institute in Irkutsk , and after the 54th year in Moscow.

Added after 4 minutes
What, where?

http://sovcom.ru/index.php?category=...181&auction=49


Added after 4 minutes

I thought mozh 30 tons is now

If you are interested, please email the picture is ready to sell is not expensive

It amazes me that, as the picture in '48 missed the relevant authorities ? In their desire to write an artist could not be too expensive this size , therefore , made ​​to order for what ever kolhoza.Tsena may even be decent, maybe someone collects such nonsense .