Signature? Please help
 

Dear Experts please help decipher the signature on the painting

I suppose that is Mitrofan S. Fedorov (1870-1942).


Although S. Mitrofan letter 'M is usually set to the name.
)

In the next topic is about the same picture: http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=163291 ...

Thank you very much!

Fedorov - exactly. Through the " Fitting ". And so there Mitrofan - who knows ? Fedorov in reference books - a small car and truck ...
There was a quip from I.Selvinskogo : "Who knows Fedorov Basil ? He also original, as his name ..."

Mueller-Kurtsvelli wrote something like this ...

Yes something like who just did not write ! Burkhardt wrote ? Wrote . Welz wrote ? Wrote . Kryzhitsky wrote ? Wrote . Schilder Andrey wrote ? Wrote . Riznichenko wrote ? Wrote . Prokofiev wrote ? Wrote . Ovsyannikov - and he wrote . And wrote a dozen landscape . Moreover, these artists - writing and a dozen imitators they have cheated . (Well, Found , Zotov - that's not to be unfounded ). So why such a obscheparohodsky landscape could not be honest and write a Fedorov ? (Especially as the signature looks good. It looks so-so reliably ). Seventeen of writing , three - put on the mind , total - Fedorov !

One does not look like it's 1913, even on a greased reproduction.


Rather, it is shorthand Arbat 90 years later ...


Yes, and signatures are placed only skoropistsy ...

To even the breeding time to save the signature, I think.

Whack-Whack - and you're done.

The quality of this work, of course, low ...
However, the state of the canvas does not have to think about the creation date "90 years later."
Although, if recorded on an old canvas ...
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->

Yeah ? And in my opinion - quite typical of the 1910s, landscape ..

Nope, nothing there , " recorded" . In the area of ​​the signature on the loss of local areas ( to be exact - vykroshek ) paint layer is clearly visible ground ( and not the underlying paint layer ).
Canvas ( judging from pictures ) - ordinal , plain weave, fine-grained enough , and rare, with large gaps between the threads of both the basis and on a duck . In a word - a typical cheap Canvas end of XIX - the first quarter of the XX century.
Soil - a single-layer , most likely - according to preliminary sizing .
A state of copyright colorful pastas - THIS CURRENT tinyscope . <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

Added after 29 minutes
Ordinary, of course.
Ordinary.
In the presentation of a coherent system of vile crept ochepyatka ...
(Like, instead of a printed "belly my comfort in high teremu" should read "Lives my poison in high teremu")

Still, I think that is a copy of a work of Mueller-Kurtsvelli ...
For example:
...

This is - convincing.
Posted by Muller-Kurtsvelli.
In the late 1900s.
Copied (possibly - with the cards, and with minor modifications) - Fedorov.
In 1913.
Федоровфедоровфедоровфедоров!

Bravo, Us-tin!
It seems to the point!
<! - 6 ~ ~ ->

Interesting coincidence (all noticed?) Are asked to help in the attribution of the painting with the same subject.

Judging from the photos, it was so.


But if there is a more detailed picture, we consider the impersonal.

Added after 1 minutes

Well Duc.
The river, trees, snow, the beauty ...