![]() |
|
200th Anniversary of the War of 1812.
Roll call of two victories: this is not final, it is only the beginning
Timothy Serhejts June 22 (according to the current so-called Gregorian New Style), Napoleon announced to his troops to march on Russia, calling the campaign a "second Polish war." Yes, on this day. Would be worth it to us to celebrate as a day of national testing and courage. Despite the differences are exactly 129 years, despite the industrial and political revolution in the world, separating the two identical dates between two howling us very much in common - to morphological literal repetition. Even the technical approach to the conquest of Russia for nearly half a century has not changed one iota. It is no coincidence the two wars we call domestic. Both of them ran into our historical memory, acquired a sacred significance. And it is precisely the memory of the first invasion helped to overcome the second. Usurper united Europe against Russia. And Napoleon, and Hitler rapidly, in about a decade, with new-fangled ideology and revolutionary social technologies came to the pinnacle of power and conquered continental Europe. Both times that do not really even mind. Both are recognized as the usurper of the European civilization of heroes who have received a place on the right of the strong and dignified. Both times England appeared an ally of Russia, who defended Russia in the end of the invasion. And both times, Britain reaped the laurels of the main winner, announcing the outcome of events in Europe precisely because of its political and military victory. Blitzkrieg kaput. It is known that Hitler was counting on a victory for a month or two, as in all his previous military campaigns in Europe. But it does not come up with it. The main method of Napoleon consisted in imposing the enemy general battle, which the usurper, and won. What, in fact, a blitzkrieg. Russian avoided a general engagement throughout the summer of 1812, then agreed to take him at Borodino, and had not been defeated. Then again evaded. The war became protracted. Blitzkrieg failed. retreat. I had to retreat to Moscow - both times. Yes, Napoleon entered, and there is no Hitler. There is a difference era. But the "point of no return" one. As for the Poles - two centuries before Napoleon. No need to go to Moscow to reach Moscow, to go to Moscow. This really is the place. It still chose Dolgoruky. And he understood this. It is no coincidence all sorts of Russophobia, and still personifies his hatred of Russia as a hate above all to Moscow. Scorched Earth. And as time Moscow was burning more than four days, from 14 to 18 September 1812 th. Burned more than five sixths of the city. The usurper was forced to move out of the Kremlin - from the very European residence, built by the Italians. During the Great Patriotic we are burned and blew up their city before the arrival of the Germans - as well as to Moscow in 1812. To the great chagrin and bewilderment of the German, does not fit into the framework of German rationalism. What to do - Russian barbarians.
Читать дальше...
|
Wins two, but as a result of the soldiers remained serfs.
It was so angered the Decembrists. Even the attitude of the soldiers has not changed for the better. This prefer not to remember. |
Цитата:
The cause of wars that we are different . We have other style of thinking , given by us to the Russian language. The present war , economic, fundamentally different. Foreigners attacked in the heart - they attacked our language, our way of thinking. Immediately affected and the family , education, communication and culture , and ... and ... The authorities , led by chiefs, did not see any effect in 1812 or in 1941 or now . Fighting off attacks from the people, that is, SOCIETY . The winner and still under the shock of the same State. Today , in the circumstances of the terrible danger of trying to reason with STATE SOCIETY . While it is impossible. Authorities did not hear. Marshal yet. In the terminology of Article retreat . The author must be careful to use words . Patriotism - there , but the words disguised thoughts. |
Цитата:
Magnolia, who attacked us ? What did they do with language ? Here is an example of the phrases , VS Chernomyrdin : - "In any language I can speak with everyone, but this tool, I try not to use it. " |
Цитата:
sell Fabian Russia Not for the first time, as you know. Perhaps he would sell his wife , children, And peace on earth, and heaven heaven He would have sold for the conscience of fair value , Yes , sorry, lies in the treasury . ( a ) :) |
Цитата:
I argue that the modern invasion of Russia has a fundamentally different nature of the signs of psychological warfare to break the "Russian" style of thinking. Remember, one of the first applications of 90-ies - "let the Russian move to the Latin alphabet." It did not work! Then began the imposition of English insertions such as "talk show" instead of "talk and show," "business lunch" instead of "business dinner" and so on. If all is well understood that each alphabetic letter - the code is one of the properties in the perception of the world, we quickly realized that the deformation of the Russian character set will make idiots and shall serve as the Indians. The aim of any war - to destroy the people by destroying their native language. Long process, but reliable. Very briefly, I wrote about this in his essay "The people and animals" (sm.dnevnik) The position of Russia - is a serious issue, and Chernomyrdin was referring to just swearing |
Цитата:
<! - ~ 11 ~ -> |
I am sure that , Russian, and style of thinking and his language is very flexible and has many well- century usvaevaet and recycles many cultures . And that just get richer. For a long time , many have their Tatar- Mongol word , French, German and so on. And on this basis arose , Pushkin , Tolstoy, and many great writers and philosophers. Thinking , too, can not be stopped in development. , And the reasons for this are many and not just the war that often splachevaet people, but it happens and contribute to its development. People can not be incubator in its grandeur , and the Russian people are great, and his greatness in the versatility and diversity of all cultures , even hostile .
|
Цитата:
<! - ~ 7 ~ -> |
Цитата:
Цитата:
|
Cyril Syzran, a word, Ur, with which many of the Russian went into battle in the translation from Tatar-environment.
And many swear words, too, from the times of the same genealogies. |
Цитата:
"• According to the" Explanatory Dictionary "VI Dal shout" hurray "like cry of Lithuanian descent" Veera (vir?) », And the Tartar word" ur "- hit from" urmak "- beat, and the Kyrgyz" uranium " - the tribal war-cry, and, finally, the Russian "uraza" - to strike. • According to the Encyclopedic Dictionary of FA Brockhaus and IA Efron, comes from the Tatar "ur" - Bey ("uranium" - a military-cry among the Kirghiz). • According to the assumption VM Mokienko, the Russian word for "cheers" could come from a war cry of the Western Slavs (cf. the cry of the Hussites Hrr na ne!), Originally meaning "Let us take the upper hand!" As the medieval borrowing from the Polish language. " • Max Vasmer displays the word "cheers" from novoverhnenemetskogo hurra, and then in turn from the Middle High hurrā, and connects these words with hurren «moving quickly», is unlikely considering the origin of the Turkic imperative ura - Bay (from urmak - beat). "The most common opinion is raising it to the German hurra -« hurray. "N.M.Shansky, for example, believes that it is a word borrowed from German only in the XVIII century." Which is not surprising when the German kings. |
Цитата:
And you some "Tatar-Mongol word" invented. <! - ~ 1 ~ -> |
Цитата:
This is a betrayal of the psychological war. And you , artcol, try not to quote this svolochizm that dirt does not fly on the internet. |
Цитата:
And if it is mentioned to someone not very good news - it's his poblemy. |
| Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 02:35. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.