A.N.Novoskoltsev, he seems?
 

Please express an opinion on the authenticity of the picture. Thank you in advance.

Show the opposite direction?

Signature is similar.
A picture is not very visible in the photo.

The plot does not guessed it yet?

The plot - not quite clear. On the one hand - a pseudo -Russian palace interior , an angry mob at the door, the boy (again - in Russian dress ), frightened , embracing his mother, and blessing the boy one . Like, everything points to Petrusha , Natalia , and the rebel archers . On the other hand : the Queen - in the European dress, with her head uncovered (and this is - if deliberate historicism Novoskoltseva other pictures ) ... Of course, by different authors (from Shteybena - Dmitriev- up of Orenburg ), the plot was interpreted in different ways. But! The very picture - a curve , oblique , with impaired vision and proportions , in a word - no relevant representations about the level of training Novoskoltseva . It seems to me , and not Novoskoltsev , and not the original and a copy of the original unknown (well, not yet been set . Sang all day .)
The signature on the submitted photograph is incised on a dry layer of colorful , raising serious doubts about its authenticity. Something like this , in general.

Poozhe that izbrazhena Archer riot scene in 1682: Natalia Naryshkin, Prince Peter Aleseevich and vozmzhno, boyar Matveyev Artamon.

  
While other photos there, the picture is not mine, I want to buy

In-in ...
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

Added after 1 minutes
Yes, it looks like a copy and not the best, by the way.

Added after 4 minutes
KORZUKHIN ...
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

That suggest, gentlemen?
Asking $ 15,000
   
Not in terms of a definitive answer, but at least it worth to spend time negotiating expertise and Comrades
  
The plot is certainly not positive, but only as an investment.

And why buy?
To further advance or at home on the wall?

   
Look every day for such a picture is difficult, therefore, considered the option purchase as an investment, without a frame size of 87.5 x 115

Then the examination , I believe , should take over the seller.
And then you go to the experts themselves , and they are to you - " is a copy ."
And then what? Making a return ? And you get?

  The proposal looks like , after the calculation of the examination which is held at my expense , if authenticity is not confirmed , I return the money for the examination. It seems the conditions are acceptable.
  Just wanted to clarify the question of the adequacy of the price pattern

Uh-huh.
And yet - O.Rossinon of the State Historical Museum.
And anyone caught either in the "Picturesque Review", or in the "World illustrations" - I do not remember (but there also was a different song ...)

Strange complexity. Let them make the examination and its value priplyusuet to its price , for example.

Gemmoroy of some kind. <! - ~ 11 ~ -> Donating to the examination will be the seller , and you pay for it ?

About the price can be ragovarivat after confirmation of authorship. As long as you have been offered , at best, a copy of the Novoskoltsev , I think.

All the same, the author does not A.Novoskoltsev.
his other work look better.

And the signature, if you compare - although similar in some places, but not him.