Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Costs, valuation, attribution (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Konchalovsky (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=161822)

Мира 10.06.2012 04:10

Konchalovsky
 
Вложений: 1
Dear friends!


What do you think about this job?
I mean, Veleka a chance that the picture is authentic.

81h63 cm


Photo page of the catalog of one of the microscopic Parisian auction has just been sent.

Eriksson 10.06.2012 11:23

world, what price?

uriart 10.06.2012 12:31

world, And here you go to the site and see whether this works in the database.

http://pkonchalovsky.com/w1/

Sandro 10.06.2012 13:44

The work is real, we must take

Игорь Гурьев 10.06.2012 18:55

Very similar to Pyotr Konchalovsky .
Very much so.

But there must be room to look at the back. To eat or not. If not, then no.

If the price is very small , so not real. Because now there are no such fools who do not know what Petr Konchalovsky , and how much it costs .

Now there are fakes Konchalovsky's 1930 , even comrade . Guriev can not tell the difference.

Серафима Вершинина 10.06.2012 19:57

All is well!
But here too the poisonous flavor, and sorry for the jargon, nesgaromnizirovanny something.
Although the picture is difficult to judge about the coloring.

Кирилл Сызранский 10.06.2012 20:00

Цитата:

Сообщение от Seraphim Vershinin (Сообщение 2133441)
But the flavor was too toxic, and sorry for the jargon, that is nesgaromnizirovanny.

Maybe someone out there pofotoshopil?
Цитата:

Сообщение от Seraphim Vershinin (Сообщение 2132341)
Well, you would at least pofotoshopili bit!
Who will sell well?
Must be nice)) <- ~ 6 ~ ->

 
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->

Серафима Вершинина 10.06.2012 20:07

Цитата:

Сообщение от "Kirill Syzran; 2133461 '
Maybe there is someone pofotoshopil?


haha))) Can-can <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

Мира 10.06.2012 20:17

Цитата:

Сообщение от Cyril Syzran (Сообщение 2133461)
Maybe there is someone pofotoshopil?
 
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->


The image from the catalog, then it is likely.

Добавлено через 3 минуты
Цитата:

Сообщение от Eriksson (Сообщение 2133041)
world, what is the price?


Provenance and Price:

Мира 10.06.2012 20:20

Вложений: 1
Цитата:

Сообщение от Eriksson (Сообщение 2133041)
World, what is the price?


Provenance and price:

Игорь Гурьев 10.06.2012 20:24

I am afraid that the real thing.

Серафима Вершинина 10.06.2012 20:27

Interestingly, while the number on the back of the same number from the catalog Raisonné-Konchalovsky?
If yes - have to take <! - ~ 1 ~ ->.

Eriksson 10.06.2012 20:36

Price is right , even a little understated for the 30s . The size is quite " Konchalovsky ." Provenance mutnovat.V registry fund such work there , but it means nothing. I also think that too clearly in those years did not write the RFP , but it can be blamed on the photo ... It seems to me - quite a PPC ...

Posted 15 minutes
Цитата:

Сообщение от Seraphim Vershinin ; 2133551"
Interestingly, while the number on the back of the same number from the catalog Raisonné - Konchalovsky ? If yes - we must take

Am submitting clarity. Konchalovsky has no complete reason. There are so -called registry works, which is constantly updated . Over a lifetime, PPK has written more than three thousand works, and in the registry until at least a thousand . The number on the back indicates that the film has passed through the family and the fund , but otstutvie number is not evidence that the work is not true .

Игорь Гурьев 10.06.2012 21:09

From the book.
Konchalovsky.
The artistic heritage.


A hunter with a dog.
In 1933.
Located in Paris.


Number is the same.

Size is not there.




So now Peter.

What, however, and can be seen.

Added after 3 minutes
Цитата:

Сообщение от Eriksson (Сообщение 2133561)
number on the back indicates that the film has passed through the family and the foundation,

Not at all.

This is the artist had in mind.

Серафима Вершинина 10.06.2012 21:22

Цитата:

Сообщение от Eriksson (Сообщение 2133561)
otstutvie number is not evidence that the work is not true.


Clear the stump!
But better still and calm, when the number is, and it coincides with the existing, though not complete, it is reasonable ...
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->


Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 07:29.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. Перевод: zCarot