Ivan Trush
 

Selling a picture of Ivan Trush, 1919, oil painted on plywood.

The size of the picture 49H37, 5.

Sarat, a delightful painting ! An excellent background in the form of some neopoznavaemoy , but certainly hostile to the human race substance. The figure - is not discussed (in which all harmony, all of a miracle ... Forgive me, Lord ). A modeling of wrinkles ! A ruzhzho ! Age-old dream come true humanity: violated the laws of gravity!
Touching in owner's inscription on the paper, closing sales . It seems that the title , name sketched a person with a very vague idea Cyrillic ...
And if no ernichestva - look for the source.

The painting was bought seven years ago at an antique stock , according to the antiquarian , formerly belonged to a family of Russian immigrants. Expertise there, but one auction house expert visually determined the age of the picture - 20s of last century. If there is serious interest in buying paintings, ready to do the examination.

In my humble opinion does not seem to Trush.

And knowing the price got out eyes on the forehead)))

Tell me, how can the big picture does not cost as much as alleged Trush Polenov big picture?)


Compare with the pictures from my collection, they are discussed here

http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...80%D1%83%D1%88

You need not waste time , I.Trush this picture just did not write .

Why can an abandoned unfinished painting.
The color palette of authorship suggests Trush.
Expertise is needed, and for any interest.

What's the interest?
On level ground to get 1000 euros?

At Trush it looks like sour kvass on champagne.

Toinen, the interest is simple - it is whether or not he wonder what Trush Trush is not.)

I used to rely on their own knowledge and experience, and expertise for the appeal only to confirm his opinion.

Toinen, agree with your IMHO.

Which, mille pardons, the palette?
Which, pardon generously and flowers?
What they illnesses, "suggest to the author"?
Who they are at this very author of "prompt"?

Russ said nothing.
Do not give an answer ...

[QUOTE=Alisa2000; 2072711 ] In my humble opinion does not seem to Trush .
And knowing the price got out eyes on the forehead )))
Tell me, how can the big picture does not cost as much as alleged Trush Polenov big picture ?)

Compare with the pictures from my collection , they are discussed here

   
-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
I also climbed the eye on the forehead when I wrote you a price , would add one more zero , but they were already on top.
This reaction was at Cyril , when he learned the price of Ukrainian artists at Ukraine.No time , as you know , put everything in its place .
 As for the price you're right, this money can buy not only the big picture Polenov, but the entire landscape in narisovany nature.So all the forests, fields , and a herd of cows lugami.So Texas cowboy , and guest-worker at the office shepherd.

And, sorry, what?

Sarat, and much more beautiful things can not be recognized scared, because they were not written.

I also climbed the eye on the forehead when I wrote you a price , would add one more zero , but they were already on top . [/QUOTE]

And why is not Pimonenko , for example?
The probability is the same as in Trush .

A vivid image of the course :
His hands were folded behind the Cossack , terrible as death,
trousers with a sharp cutting and folds , any icon-painting workshop will envy ...
sticking a pistol in his belt ...


Thrush ?
so funny just ...