"If the galleries are closed - so that someone needs."
 

Why close the gallery, can someone explain?

What is this process that?

And who needs it?


Don't panic!
Open letter to Helen Selina

Will explain all the time, in a quick time. If there is a conspiracy to samolikvi datsiyu and bankruptcy and is antipiar on contemporary art , then there is a conspiracy , and on the other , more reliable way to make money. Will bid on new artists , we forget about Anya acorn , etc. Maybe start a new, more intelligent aktualschikov pyramid , with the support of the State or some other sponsors. I think these accidents only increased the appetite .

Gelman explained here:

According to the letter, the gallery decided to go the way of the development cost of money.

To be in the mainstream of contemporary currents <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

One of the vulnerabilities in the areas that it focuses on the rich, not the middle class. It's like a bank, which rests not on a thousand medium-sized, and the three major contributors. Two are gone and all ...

Posted 3 minutes
Talk of state support in some form already underway. Here's what Sergey wrote on Kapkov Snob: "Various experts say that market collectible in the world today is low. Demand is falling, but it is wavy process. To this must be treated philosophically today, so tomorrow will be different. Only gallery that never closed, and rather successfully operate - antique. As for the question of the closure and reformatting contemporary art galleries, here I see the following risks: Gallery - a representative of the artists, galleries open up new names and give them a start in life. It is best exhibited in galleries artists from those who are in the world today - so this picture determines what work will be filled with museums in the future. Galleries, including bringing up the audience, teach them to walk to the exhibition, form the culture. Therefore, if the galleries are closed - it does not just mean that the market does not, it will also mean that the place to meet the artist and the viewer does not.

One of the outputs of the situation I see in that part of the state participated in the financing of exhibitions and helped expand the presence of Russian galleries on such iconic venues as the Art Basel in Miami and many others. I do not think that subsidies for "kill" the market, rather the opposite - an investment in the future because the demand for art, too, need to grow. "
Source: http://www.snob.ru/selected/entry/48...mmentId=478901

<! - ~ 1 ~ ->
Indeed, as museums cope without galleries.
Well, about the " teach them to walk to the exhibition , form the culture ..." - No comments.
In general, repair of the theater of a billion $, for small projects.

The collector is not necessarily a very rich man . Great artists in their youth are very cheap , you just have to know them, but it does take a lot of money is not as much love for art.
Error orientation of the rich merchants in the sector leads to a narrowing of possible buyers. This concerns the so-called modern and Islands, which can hardly be called art. It has become difficult to vtyuhivat that's close.

 
And all the modern (relatively) in the museums of art acquired in his time with the CX-collective exhibitions, personal.

Now perform the functions of CX is just the gallery.

Is not it?

No!
These functions are performed by CX.

What you say!
Really?
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->

Then give me the total number of exhibitions in Moscow Union of Artists of 20,011 per year.

And I'll give you back the numbers of exhibitions in galleries in Moscow.

And compare.
<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

Like a typo.
Oh, do not see that there is a CX and will exist at all art <! - ~ 9 ~ ->

April 23 will be a press conference of the three galleries.
But something tells me that the user Fed is closer to the truth.

I think that the new structure of contemporary and modern art will be more mobile and rigid. And the more successful in the selection and promotion of artists. Perhaps large cash flows will change the direction of the Moscow Union of Artists in the organization. That will shake very mossy and decayed over the decades from the organization of family ties , in which art and creativity has long been on the tenth plane.Esli MOSH will not show in mind and remain in their original positions , and egalitarianism loyalty to the lack of talent, his end will come later this desyatiletii.Ya 'm not talking about the good shows , they just nebylo for many years.

If the Russian Union of Artists still performs these functions, it is wonderful!
But is it interferes with one another?
Someone will buy exclusively from the galleries, and some trusts only the work of the workshop.

Recently, a workshop for the purchase of the Museum of Modern Art was taken the work of renowned artist who lives in Moscow, Alexander Ishin - vividly confirms that the true test idea. No matter how and by whom work gets into the museum, it is important to the quality of work, its authenticity and relevance avtora.Uvy MOSH has long been closed up on itself and this ananizm can not be fruitful in the advancement of their dignity , even artists on the world stage.