Picture Zarubina
 

As can be seen from the inscription on a label with the exhibition from private collections , the picture is called " Windmill " (not " rustic toilet ", as one might expect at first glance ). Of course , there is at this artist thing and better, but , but the price is quite reasonable - $ 4,000 .
By the way, the label error, in fact, oil on canvas on cardboard .
Bother with a great desire there is no confirmation - from the topic of Stozharov I firmly learned that the publication of any age Tretyakovsky bills. Directory of St. Petersburg's first show under my hand there , but I'm sure this is all right , and if anyone really set his face to get the thing , the right information will be found quickly. In addition , the subject comes from a respectable house, where he watched from the moment I first got there , it is already 15 years .
In this regard, I consider that to question the authorship Zarubina not make much sense .
PSVprochem , any creative fun , as well as assumptions such as that under the letter "Z" is not hiding who anyhow , and the great Zalupkin - welcome!

Do not want to sound " clever ", but if written by a mill, and I see that the mill , then why should the seller at his thing (which he wants to sell) to say the toilet ?

A new marketing ploy ?

Fuflyachoks ....

and pochemus?

There is no reason at this stage, so unreasonable to characterize the work.

there was a new breed of "Internet based experts" - "fuflicheks" and into the bushes <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

This is my personal mnenie.Zarubin (especially in the late 90's) I came across quite often.
When you make a positive assessment, I admit that I was not prav.A so far I have this opinion.

This is what we learned!
But I would like some specifics, that it was not like it?

That's right, no reason to doubt the authenticity of the pictures there . It is currently Zarubin . And besides, on the back of a exhibition label, the text of which coincides with the text of the catalog :

Convincingly.
But often for such directories and do falshakov.
We need all the same assessment, though ....
maybe nature)

And for the "bong" should be put brandy!
(Seller)

Picture the back of the picture in full size without birki.Otkuda made clear picture labels, probably with a different picture?

As educated people, I suffered for some time, allowing the author of "fuflyachka" to justify his opinion. Yes, and reluctant to enter into discussion with him was not so, thanks to others who made it for me.
Today it is clear that there are no studies of it and not wait for more so in an amicable way to apologize to this man's head can not come (which really there "brandy for a bong!").
Instead: "... In my circle" - the author forgets to add. However, it is natural that the habitue (judging by the number of references to this point in his posts) market in Izmailovo judge for themselves and their surroundings.
In general, Internet forum - not a bad place to raise self-esteem. But you can not just to shit, practicing in the rudeness of other members of the forum on personalities, but also feel a kind of gray eminence, Seeders witty murderous characteristics that influence the course of discussions about high-profile names, but often great.
That did not sit quietly merchant Nechitailo (see his posts). After all, would make interesting, vivid, first hand reviews Izmailovo exhibition. So, no, it does not plow in his field, he pulls in the CHA, to reason with an air of profundity about this salon:
Here and there - wrote "fuflyachoks" and communicate with it already, ask him questions, that is, the task of drawing attention to his own person entirely resolved.

With regard to examinations, that someone is needed from me. I think that generally (at least in situations similar to this one) is that there are necessary expertise especially fans poumnichat wasted. For the real presence of the buyer papers review - minor matters. If he doubts the authenticity of the picture, you still find a way to verify this independently, thus making their own strong opinions.
The only thing I'm willing to help the issue, it is - make a small discount, approximately equal to the value of low-cost expertise to the next buyer could spend the difference on the solution of their doubts. For the authenticity of his stuff, of course, am responsible.

The tag is placed on exhibition with modern corrugated cardboard, apparently served as a backdrop when the picture was exhibited. On the original cardboard no markings there.
However, I believe that it is of great importance has not. Even whether label affixed directly to the old board, careful people would still say that it "might-stick in there with a different picture."