"Supremacist Madonna Malevich
 

The magazine in 1996 stumbled upon the work of Malevich called "Supremacist Madonna" Who has information on the history of this work. Thanks

Ruben, and in what magazine? Something is very doubtful whether the existence of such things in the legacy of Malevich.

Ruben, I'm such a Malevich saw. If I used just shown, without reference to the magazine (by the way, what?), I would say-not Malevich.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 48 seconds[/color]
Sandro, agree with your doubts.

Malevich
 

Journal "measure" of St. Petersburg's 1994 article Koftuna and "Hashem Heritage" in 1998 in the article by Elena Basner.

Ruben, Basner in "H, N." found, but was unable to print and see, too.
http://www.nasledie-rus.ru/podshivka/1998-46.php
Can you get here and you put a link to the article or the article itself.

On this site articles in the binder are available only since 2001. Alas ...

Unfortunately, it is interesting that there Basner dug up?
But with the 98-th was nothing? Publications.
It is a sensation or event ... Well ...
Someone clarify something?

This is not Malevich. Such naive tracks I have not met the artist.
(especially the golden arch)
Malevich present here is.

nikola, but I really want to know what's happening there E. Basner wrote.
It is well-known personality.
E. Basner: Yes there is added: "Yes he was drunk, yes? Well, not working, not working! That is, all in all really need to understand. And, coming back after all to what we have invented - an entirely different principle. The fact is that in the mid-forties, with the beginning of the nuclear era, with the beginning of the nuclear tests appeared fundamentally new isotopes of certain elements, which previously did not exist in nature. And flax, that's the same flax, which grows in the field, he absorbs it all. Then this makes flax oil, and this is all there is, and this oil makes the paint. That is, we have learned to detect this.

http://old.echo.msk.ru/guests/15068/

[All copy on my work. Tomorrow I shall send a copy of the article Elena Basner and Koftun. If not mistaken, this work has been published in a certain Austrian directory early nineties. For Nicholas, this is not a golden arch ramka.B] Cyril Syzransky[/B],

It is clear that the frame, but the shape of her arch ... Malevich, that under the frame composition hurrying?

and another Malevich was so ...

Listen, the whole meaning of Suprematism was divorced from reality, but here some of the geometric elements drawn quite realistic composition. clear that the manufacturer of this masterpiece did not bother to read the theoretical work of Malevich. I do not know what to write such distinguished people as Kovtun and Basner, but, in my opinion, this can not be in principle.

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]
This is not Malevich, this apprenticeship.

qwerty, you got me, of course, very sorry, but the first and fourth - in 1929. 100%say it is impossible, but it is believed that after the invention Malevich Suprematism created such works, which show that he was to Suprematism came across a search ...

Flower generally two.
Malevich is repeated a lot. For the Berlin exhibition is done, and the date stamped with the 14th and 12th where he was.
But Flower masterpiece, in my opinion.