Which artist is the forgery?
 

Topic is very interesting and wide.
It would be particularly interesting to hear the independent (unbiased) experts and specialists.

Konstantin,
They are constantly changing, as fashion.
The remaining statistics here.
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=1365

The question can be divided into two.
Who do ...
And who is now in vogue in poddelschikov.
For example three or four months ago, I was warned about Rukhin. His many works should not be (a fire in the studio), and then suddenly fell out on the market much - is suspicious.

Your Rating not less than appropriate here.

I understand that this rating is on the last 100 falshakam. Over what period, I wonder? Two months? Three? Six months?

I would still see the overall ranking of counterfeit artists. At least for the approximate total number of counterfeits. Clearly, Chagall or Lansky with their unimaginable number of studies difficult to compare with the same Rukhin on "specific weight" genuine fakes in the unit of work (in a wrap:)), but it is important not so much relative as absolute figures. For example, Chagall - 2000, Lanskoy - 1000, Rukhin - 100 (figures conditional). From these figures, incidentally, would be difficult to estimate the relative number of fakes on the original unit of work. Then it will be understandable to a certain average percentage of fakes, strolling on the market. (Something I was already in nonsense sort incurred:)).

But the question is really interesting.

Konstantin,
Sorry, the phrase should look like this:
"Top 10" authors "of fakes of 100 recent works."

ACG,
As I understand it may be three types of forgeries. (Artist purely notional.)
First, someone wrote "The Ninth Wave" one to one, signed by the artist and displays the work for Aivazovsky.
Second, someone writes or finds work on the marine theme, signed as an artist and gives him her the same.
Third, take the first available job, sign it, Aivazovsky and vparivayut fools know nothing about art, Aivazovsky usually through online auctions such as e-Bay.
Question to you, how would you classify all three types and which of them is most common for, say, the second Polovnyov artists of the twentieth century?

Denis E., I can not think: Do I understand correctly that of the 100 works collected in recent years for examination, the order of 70 were false?

Last month, year, 5 years? Statistics works in Moscow, Russia, the former union republics?
Interesting statistics on Mashkova? What you mozhite more specifically to say?

Konstantin,
Over the past four years, I found forty (!) Forgery of a famous painter of the twentieth century. I am sure that there are many more. And in general it's time, I think, begin to spread in the network so that these fake people to know "these heroes."

Well, write that the artist interesting.

dedulya37

1) What is the artist? (if not secret)
2) How do I find? Has made an evaluation? Or at the peephole.

Then out after the examination and what the drama played out.

Vladimir,
Yes, Vladimir, you are understood correctly, one hundred works - seventy false. Our statistics fabrications constantly varies from 50 to 70 percent. True, there is one thing but we usually have a problem in advance of the thing or the contrary, those that believe.

Eugene,
Statistics for the past few months. Mashkov, Malevich, Saryan, Roerich our rare guests and statistics on them mostly deplorable, unfortunately.

a Aivazovsky with Korovin you have probably the most frequent visitors? )))))

Is there any scientific advances in technologies for the graphics?
 

ACG, Denis E., as well as graphics things? Are there any technologies that give dating? Generally, in principle, the establishment of such technology possible?

And read about the progress in nuclear dating methods: http://www.artinvestment.ru/news/art...forgeries.html Can you comment? In fact, working? Then, after all, and graphics can clarify?

Vladimir,
Dear Vladimir,
With more complex graphics, but if it does not "pencil on paper", then all is not lost. Since I can argue and say that the paper can be dated. Of course you can, but with the same ease you can buy old paper on the flea, were precedents when selling whole albums, in which famous artists have been drawn troika couple of tracks, the remaining sheets are clean, quite in a position to creative research. Graphic dates as well as painting, it also has pigment and binder. Technologies have existed for more than five years and every year improving.

Regarding nuclear dating, from my point of view, any way to have the right to life, especially if it is scientifically justified. But there has long been more accurate and simple methods of dating. Actually dating to the binder. Recent developments make it possible to divide the periods of dating is not up to 45 years and after. And at ten, twenty, fifty, seventy and one hundred. And with the Russian avant-garde, generally there is no problem, it is determined by the technology easy enough, with the same Russian Museum, a few years ago bought the infrared spectrometer, which allows you to explore and to date organic pigments, I am not talking about your humble servant.

Quote from the article:
"Falsifiers well have learned to forge a signature, artificially grow old canvases and paints to create, by their chemical composition are indistinguishable from those that were made at the beginning of the century ..." and this statement from any engineer, surely trigger a smile. Movies they had seen, perhaps, with Pierce Brosnan :-)