Can you believe this expertise?
 

Offered a job Levitan. With such expertise. It has a link to the examination of this work in the SRM, but to me it did not provide, such as lost. What about this examination can tell who to this face?

In my opinion, "Filkin charter.
Ekspetnoe conclusion of 2001, the second refers to the examination of SRM 1971-th, which is not itself an expert opinion of Reference signed by one person, a chief specialist (what?).
Full set!
Do not be surprised that it would be and Mr. (Mr. zhy) Vashchenko II not exist in nature.

Ah, would a lawyer-case ba collapsed with such "documents". Sweet deal. And too much money to rake!
At Levitan-is to give? One word-Krasnodar Territory!

But because the original document - printing costs!

Sergei with such expertise should be careful, in fact its not, I faced (2007) with expertise in Krasnodar Art Museum (on a small work Lagorio), something like that, too, is very weak.

Where are we really to the center of art - Syzran. The local art all over Russia are known.
I did not really believe in this paper, but this had seen, in particular the Department of the Ministry of Culture of Armenia, some provincial departments of culture. But still not enough, all the same as the inscriptions on the paintings of other authors - "confirm authorship." Not only this for attribution. Put here for what might be who is confronted with the documents of this office.

SergeiSK,
I would not believe such securities. It Levitan same! If it's him!
So experts are good at his work - Petrov VA, one of the best.
If not the best.
A local paper spill - gravy!

SergeiSK,
Good morning ladies and gentlemen, if any, but are hiding :-)
In any document should be available at least two factors, the availability of the organization that is trusted and the presence of a specialist who is a recognized expert. Second without the first and it is normal practice, but the first without the second, can not be.
Let's just say if you trust your feelings and have confidence, then take it, if not, then it is better not to get involved. Sometimes, the lack of a better paper than its presence :-)
But on the other hand, a paper with the official stamp gives you the right, at the official transaction, if the assessment is wrong and there is a demonstrable fact that you have suffered damage to court. Better for your place of residence, of course :-)

[color="# 666686"]Added after 1 minute[/color]
uriart,

Ignatova Natalya

Art Consulting,
While you are there do not want to ask about:) I sent you a letter via e-mail asking for help to attribute my picture Fedor Riznichenko, which is now in Moscow. You have received this letter?

SergeiSK,
Unfortunately, no. We have a huge amount of correspondence, the letter could be lost. If you do not make it more difficult, try to duplicate LukashinD (sobaka) yandex (tochka) ru

Art Consulting,
OK! Duplicated.

Lord, but interestingly, after the recent scandals to the mega-critics-expert, and just a very decent and responsible person with the presence of self-esteem VA Petrov someone else call for advice?

Naturally. Very much.

Cyril Syzransky, of course?? Strangely it ... Trust irresponsible person, in fact, sign in their own incompetence - surely?? Man, forever stained participation in provocative fraudulent "Catalog fakes?
Perhaps this is natural ...
However, do not you think that an honest man after all that happened should have been, at least, return the money for all of their "erroneous" conclusion? And disappear from the market this forever?