Rate Aivazovsky painting
 

Rate painting by Aivazovsky, Size: 300 * 600 mm

Not Aivazovsky!

whose picture do you?

It is well known whose - N /H.

Explain what is meant N /X?

There is also a signature of the author

Unknown artist signed Aivazovsky.

You can find your arguments?

Knowledge and experience!

no offense to say, but it is not as serious, I would not just experience, concreteness, where, what, how.
There are different people like different pictures and would like to know what you're guided on a photo with a bad image is uniquely responsible N /H.

Thank you for your time and attention

Do not want to disappoint you , but it is NOT Aivazovsky . You can not trust the signature in the presence of water. No characteristic Aivazovsky light effect on the water . Seagulls and sailboat NOT Aivazovsky . This work has suffered considerably , but there is no Crazing . Seascape paintings almost everything Crazing . Weighty proof that it is not Aivazovsky - an autograph . He does not match the reference samples . At the signing of the Cyrillic alphabet , Aivazovsky had never done " tails " on the last letter , which did not consider the author of this work .
So I agree with the previous panelists . This H /A, signed painting by Aivazovsky name . But not uniquely Aivazovsky .

At present Aivazovsky water as it shines ... and everything is permeated with light and air ... At the same picture all of your rough, heavy water, no light, no air .... And for the signature, I do not speak at all ...

IMHO

A foam as Aivazovsky wrote!
Subtly, as if embroidered lace on the canvas.
And you have a picture?
I wanted to make a joke, but I will not.
 
Compare.

Thank you for your attention , but the picture 's not in very good condition, and even in the bad, and stored in the attic, where it is damp, dry , paint, tend to lose light and shine. A signature on the account , well, a man can not sign all the time monotonously, do you agree? ? slightly longer or slightly shorter than the "tail" is not an argument , as for me , but the signature is also important.
And at the expense craquelure you yourself say , almost, but not all.
Which is another argument ? ?
All the same, such a question, if it Aivazovsky, would make an examination , but before you know the price you forum users to avoid so deceived to say how much such a product with the size 300 * 600 mm may be worth ?

Added after 1 minutes

do not need to joke, I'm serious

This can cost U.S. $ proizvidenie 300 maximum, and then in uncomprehending zhivopisi.Ne entertain the hope that's not even a student Aivazovsky, and just ignorant.

It is already possible to conduct statistical records: a loft-so-ordinary Aivazovsky :rolleyes:>