![]() |
Graphics "amateur"
|
Цитата:
Dora , of course , is felt . I think Karapetyan started with copying , now do not do that , but when something - it was a mandatory part of training. Incidentally , the same Valentine Podpomogov never studied him at all grade 4 education (this site http://www.podpomogov.am/biograf.htm and here it is on the forum ) . [color=#666686 " ]Added after 58 minutes[/color] By the way , L-ana64110, good theme , artists and amateurs, or even - Effect amateur, it would be interesting to see who Colleagues promptly inserted " and she gladly dug in memory and on the Internet , if you open this topic ( since I started ) . :) > |
I too often have to deal with amateurs.
But we must distinguish where the real amateur, and where the so-called "naive art". Talent can occur even in those who did not learn anything. More complicated when he is not among those who received the fundamental artistic training. |
ConSferArt, and that in fact it is: the "talent"?
This is probably as intelligence (in fact there are different) .. |
Цитата:
I think with the talent of more or less clear, it is still an innate quality, but what about intellect? |
Цитата:
Samvel, is more innate than talent! (IMHO, I have experience) |
Цитата:
I think the talent of intelligence - something innate. But with the talent of the picture, you can write. But the intellect in this work, I even know. :)> |
Цитата:
What to do (and then with it)? |
Цитата:
Well, probably yes. In general, intelligence is responsible for more common sense, and talent - a natural expression of their desires and skills. |
Цитата:
And I think that most likely intelligence and common sense do not touch. Well, for example. (A healthy body, healthy mind) common sense and intelligence can break down this statement to the nines. |
Цитата:
:)> |
Цитата:
|
Talent Intelligence + = relevant, contemporary artist.
|
Цитата:
Actual artist=Talent Intelligence Actual artist = Intellect Talent Current hodozhnik = - ( Talent + Int) But I would like more of a dilettante. It is generally quite a difficult problem in the art and science. With science will be easier , say in physics, has long been no dilettantes . But once were . They were and are in technology They are many in the art . In my opinion art amateur (this not on Contemporary ) features special thoroughness . Always seems to the layman , if you draw all the details , you can achieve perfection , and the parts are poorly connected to each other. Recount and draw all the cilia , but not notice that one eye is higher than the other . But even if an amateur is really talented and good design , and everything is in place , all the same thoroughness - it's like a birthmark - forever. |
Цитата:
|
| Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 17:01. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.