Museum of Contemporary Russian Art in Jersey City
 

Museum in Jersey City was founded by Alexander Glaser and Valery Zhiltsova in November 2006, but in this building since Sept. 17, 1980, that is the anniversary of the Moscow Bulldozer Exhibition, held September 15, 1974, opened the first American exhibition of informal art. Since then and until 2006, here promoted the works of Russian nonconformist artists Oskar Rabin, Vladimir Nemukhin, Boris Sveshnikov, Anatoly Zverev, Oleg Tselkov, Ernst Unknown, Eric Bulatov, Mikhail Shemyakin, Vladimir Yakovlev, E. Steinberg, Oleg Vassiliev, and other non-painters. This tradition continues today, in addition to it, along with the works of former informal, displays works by contemporary Russian artists who live around the world, including in Russia (Moscow, St. Petersburg, Nizhny Novgorod, Ufa, Novosibirsk, Novokuznetsk, Vladivostok ), in Belarus, Ukraine (Kiev, Kharkov, Zaporozhye, Odessa, Feodosia), as well as in Paris, New York, Jerusalem, Toronto and Montreal for four years before the first exhibition in the museum building, A. Glaser founded a similar museum near Paris , the exhibition of which were transported to America and continued here.
http://www.museum-rus.ru/about.htm

Mr. Zhil'tsov engaged in Minsk in such business as sewing uniforms and making chevrons. And with a certain reason founded gallery "Zhilbel. He was (perhaps somewhere and is now) a collection of modern Belarusian art. Quite a diverse and vkusovschinnaya. There have been several works of high class, but largely secondary works and authors not bad, probably because "that Mr. Zhiltsov played in patronage a la master (I think so).

And then play with clothes and chevrons over, something with the police, he nahimichil. But managed to escape from Belarus:) I think that part of the museum - of the property Zhiltsova.

There is a site of his collection, now it is available, but it was that disappeared. So why look so far is:)

http://www.art-collection-belarus.info/about.htm

One might think that a big part of this museum - of the property Zhiltsova, because the second eagle, which everyone seems to have sold - works from his collection have long been traded in all of Western auctions (I know who, and you all know naernyaka:))

It's - two-headed eagle! :) I think that these kindred spirits find each other and fused ...

I remember they are often in the Crimea! Stripped all the way (artists, gallery owners) that svisnut some fans and the kids leave home in the two premises! Rare crooks.: Cool:

Artem, Thank you. Let us know what kind of gallery owners ..

Here a few memories of the beginning of this museum:

http://uryst.livejournal.com/187559.html

http://uryst.livejournal.com/188105.html

Interestingly, because who would not could not sell, or somehow else was?

Probably, no money otdyvali work, hoping for "the future of millions, which they promised ...
And maybe give some Khoi-penny.

That's me and interesting. Many artists sell their work for real money at the time, but when prices rose this became known as "paid for nothing."

gans, have Artem and porasprashivat about their trips to the Crimea.

Admission widely known since Soviet times:) And we have forum users on the other side of the Hudson? Museum is not well known in Russia. This photo essay to get there?

Very simple. Then I worked as an art gallery in the CEP, and we met these guys, as they say with music, buffet and all that. On the "Bulldozer Exhibition" there was much talk and everyone listened with her mouth open. First, they bought a fairly large quantity of work Crimean artists, some were given no money and in consequence they are properly brought and paid money. Then the naivete of our guys! Did you give hope. Specifically Zaitseva, Dolgikh, Babanin, Laptev, Makeyev, Sahorov. Gotcha! That's all! Simply and clearly.

In Moscow, one asked me to find the Museum of Modern iskva in New York. Arrived said iskusvo Veda take work in the museum. I looked, there are no such museum. There is another museum SI. In my opinion he did not believe me and gave them work. I told him that he is a fool.

MoMA - Help
 

MoMA - The Museum of Modern Art, New-York.
Museum of Modern Art in New York has existed since 1929 and is a respected museum. He owns a lot of Europeans, early 20 century - Van Gogh, Monet, Picasso, Cezanne, Matisse, Munch ... However, the exposition is littered with very modern (and not so - the second half of the 20 century), Amer. "art", which is more napiminaet design at best. Classic Amer. - Warhol, Pollock, Mondrian, Rothko, Bacon ...
Those interested can get acquainted with him in the book:
Museum of Modern iskusstva.Nyu York. 2005 WORD

Another thing is that crooks can hide behind that name.

To lower the message once again repeat that my personal opinion totally against what is called Amer art. I call it - Amer. design. Evidently, I grew up and was educated in the Old World. And I was totally drawn to America. Somehow I close red Petrov-Vodkin to GTG than red Rothko at MoMA. I do not think it necessary to waste precious space on the new answer, then answer "in advance".

     And yet - I do not use Internet sources, when something I write. Everything I wrote is taken in the memory or the sources are cited to be verified. And in the network so much wrong debris and error - do not believe it so easy to journalists and the online newspaper!

Fortunately for the State Tretyakov Gallery, MoMA, and other famous museums, I do not intend to become their manager, so can hardly be dangerous for the modern concept of "art", a twisted and gathered hands unknown to me electricians, fitters, carpenters and designers. Let us on this subject, Mr. K, Syzran, let's talk a hundred years. I'll be ready to apologize for his maximalism, if by that time it will be interesting to people. PR - goes as the depletion of the advertising budget, and art - forever. Can recall a lot of Western companies, known in his time, trativshish millions and billions on advertising, but now forgotten. So in Amer. "art" - will come new products to replace the old brands. We carry out re-branding? With Rothko is possible to imagine - but it is unlikely to Rembrandt and Van Gogh.