Beautiful stranger
 

Dear forum !
Continuing the excavations in the family archives , meeting :) > stumbled upon a picture . Paper on a stretcher , watercolor ( probably ) . Stretcher pasted a newspaper with the text with " Z " characters. How valuable this product with thin . point of view and with such damage ? How to restore ? Maybe someone knows the author ? Advise what to do .

I am afraid that nothing can be done.
Killed outright.

found it on the street 15 years ago, was lying next to the trash.
:(>

Yes .....
Probably need to be a humanist and poor return to where you found it .....
:)>

JOKE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
 
thing you can do will look good ...
but I'm not sure that this watercolor.

Most likely it is printed.

Printing??
But she's clearly old, behind papered with newspaper beginning of the century.
Then, too, printed reproductions of such quality?
It seems to me, or watercolor or gouache.
Should I restore?
The issue price of costs and the final result ...
without significance :)>

[QUOTE="Tsop; 1604991]It seems to me, or watercolor or gouache.[/QUOTE]


And what if the bed?


[COLOR="Gray"], or it will be complete nonsense? [/COLOR]

Well check out , because , watercolor and gouache are reversible , ie diluted with water . Have a look at corner , wipe lightly wet wool , will mark ...
It is hardly possible to restore , except that with strong intervention ... Furthermore , nobody knows who the author and who is represented ... Under such circumstances, it is worth nothing ...

Looked and looked ...

And I can not even understand what it is, what years?

Either 1880, or 1920.


By the look and bearing model - like the 1920, and on clothes - like 1880 ...


Written very masterovito.

But really, is not whether the reproduction?

To me, too, more like a fully chipped pastel . Can not be restored . The maximum that can be attributed restorer to pick it cleaned , consolidated and finished ( or rather re- wrote ) it . Then it will then get nice historical reconstruction, which can sell for the old original portrait or simply hang on the wall for the interior styling . Despite the fact that the portrait will be a new , old patina remains .... Although the money will be released as per the original purchase probably ) ) )

Hold a more extensive study and accomplish your goal :)>

New data
 

Received a revised version of origin of the picture and the reasons for its salvation :)>.
Indeed found in a landfill . Taganka , in the early 1960s. (63-64 ). Friends -artists passing (perhaps happily ) put forward the theory that a girl like Nadezhda Udaltsova wife Drevins . Like her portraits of the century. :confused:> supposedly someone saw her pictures and is very similar, who allegedly wrote to some friends Drevins . Spared and taken to landfills.
Since then, lay in the studio, while I have not dug up .
Poorly in this hard to believe , but check wish :)>. Do you have one old photo ? Compare.
Sorry in advance , it looks like complete nonsense :)>

Tsop, at Yandex - please:


It?
:)>

I-V These photos I've seen too.
Nose accurately bolshevat :)>

May have earlier in my youth?
in some kind of group pics?

Probably bullshit ...

Due to the fact that it will still have to re-draw, tell restorer "I want Udaltsova was" and you will be better than Udaltsova in the photo.


P.S.
I think it is not.
But if you are so warm this version of the heirs are alive in Moscow, you can ask.

:)>
 

I will try to arrange :)> :)> :)> with a restorer.


I also think it is not.
But the version of a very beautiful :)>