Found in Latvia now Klodt, help determine the original or a reproduction
 

Provide assistance in establishing the original

Reproduction is printing, circulation products worth two cents worth .. what you mean by the word "reproduction"?

Show details back side ..
Specify size.

if you still need the information ready to give

Добавлено через 2 минуты
Dear Eugene Onegin almost thank you that enlightened

In such pictures do not say anything.

Generally it is strongly reminiscent of reproduction with embossed "relief swabs, does not coincide with the real relief.

Take plenty of pictures.
What's on the back, traces of restoration?

size of the stretcher.
 Actually, it resembles a real picture.
If Silvestre will not make normal photo, let him live with this suspicion. :shy:

Consent. Look closely at the photo number 1. Embossed branches does not match the pattern. Pay attention to the gap basis patterns in the upper right corner, if not all loose paint, then maybe, break the paper.

Found in Latvia, something worthwhile and still count on her nedootsennenost not worth it. :) "Walk on the antique shops in Riga last month left a painful impression. On the one hand, all equipped with European auctions catalogs and the Internet (If you got something worthwhile exhibit there), and on the other hand plenty of fakes on the walls, and their not particularly shy.

Klodt
 

the only difference is that I am her naschel 1977

Well then certainly not a reproduction on canvas . :)
But seriously, I think the signature is even similar to Mikhail Konstantinovich , especially the letter " M " and "K " . Maybe it makes sense to fork out for examination . And if you want to hear is something more clearly, make good photos . Although it is so clear that the technique of writing course "day and night "with well-known works Klodt .