Slepyshev?
 

Dear forum members, I ask you to look at is such a landscape. Can the work painted by Anatoly Slepysheva (b. 1932), in your opinion?

1. Author - n /s (A. Slepyshev?)

2. The material and technique - hardboard, oil

3. Size - 42 x 52 cm

4. Date - Ser .- 2 nd floor. XX.?

5. Inscriptions signature - on the back of the upper right. corner of the pale sign graph. pencil: AS Slepyshev (see photo 7), black marker on the left top. corner: 018 227 6.000 (see photo 6)

6. Status - is generally good, not significant. worn and crumbling at the edges

7. expert opinion - absent

8. pictures - 1, 2 - general view, 3, 4, 5 - fragments, 6, 7 - turnover

9. Origin of the picture - bukinistich. shop

I apologize for the quality video images, but so far only those. Thanks in advance to all!

Well, for starters - this is freestyle with a copy of Corot paintings from the Pushkin Museum.
Pushkin (or from the Hermitage, I do not remember exactly).

Why this should have been done Slepyshevu - is unclear.

Although it is possible that this Slepyshev.

Something like that I'm in it and felt. And what kind of painting by Corot (try to find yourself)?

If Spepyshev, it is likely that early, "doparizhsky" (though I, frankly, none of his work before the 70-ies. Did not see)?

That's what brings the curse abroad.
Mr. Sasha have confused the Louvre and the Hermitage and the Pushkin Museum.


"Remembering the Mortefontene, 1864, x., M. The Louvre, Paris


With regard to Slepysheva, by feeling it, I would not attribute this work.

Even if it Slepyshev, the bad

Igor Sasha, fabosch, thank you very much! Very nice name for the picture Coro - "Remembering the Mortefontene" ... Mortefonten - a small village north of Paris, known for its English landscape park. Now there are more and avtopoligon firm Matra :eek:

I would appreciate if posvetuete what to do with the confirmation of authorship (if at all possible)

Doubts on this score:


1. If, contrary to expectation, this work Slepysheva, it guarantees that it will confirm the authorship of no, given that the thing is probably not the best.

2. In the picture there is no provenance.

Advise me what to do and whether it makes sense, in general, all these do? Thank you!

Something, in my opinion, it does not seem to Slepysheva, he had another smear.


Although what happens in life ...


Try to ask him what he balk if he is?

I'm thinking that it might be Slepyshev what some of his student's copy of a student in any case it is not worth much because it is a copy ... I've seen pictures and remembered that I had 60 years gathering dust a copy of this work, Caro written by my grandmother, at that time a student Surikov Institute ..

That seems to me that this early his thing. Especially, not canvas, and canvas. It is unlikely that it is a fake - fake Slepysheva not seen it, but, I think, the forgers would try to imitate his late style.

I saw a picture in a beech. store - to lay in a heap of boring, ordinary pictures almost on the floor. Immediately thought: Slepyshev! Flipped, and at an angle not easily read the pale pencil inscription AS Slepyshev. Bought for 4,800 rubles.

Work your grandmother, Lucy, is not "apparent" <!--~ 2 "-" I will wait :)

The same opinion, for the examination to go no financial sense

Oh I hope not show up, I do not sell grandma ..
:D

Well - I see!
(I would say do not display the :)) A nice picture like this.

This receipt number - 018,227 and the price - 6.000 now.
This store five years ago sold a weak copy of Camille Corot "A gust of wind."
It is unlikely that the work submitted was painted by AS
Slepyshev.

My opinion - this m /b Slepyshev.

Or so - a man, well versed in the art, knowing where someone's name to sign.

And get after write-downs and paying commission something about three and a half thousand rubles.
:)

Chicken on a grain!