Burliuk
 

I appeal to those who follow the Burliuk.

Three years ago, the work of four medium-size can be bought for
$ 20-40 thousand. I had the feeling that should greatly add.
Oh just pass for a hundred. Currently there are no - why?

Here the situation is clear.
Five years ago Burliuk can be purchased for $ 5000-8000.
Then during the year /two prices are up by 5-8 times. And they just in the forty. Those who did not want to sell for 5000, considered that the 40000 is already normal. And Burliuk got a lot on the market,
and all who wanted to buy. Now the situation should settle.
My opinion - through the year and a half will still jump.
About this work I can say that looking at the photograph, it is a good Burliuk.
But my friend was at that Sotheby's and saw her alive. He had great doubts.
Burliuk always "volume" is always a lot of paint, but this is flat.

Here are the results of Sotheby's 12.02.
All 18 Burliuks were sold. Later, 40-50 years on the upper estimate, early in excess of 2-3 times. Average price ie $ 20-30 late and all so-so, in my opinion.

In my not badly sold.
And here is 05.03.2009 =1285560 & m []=1285540 & m []=1276760"] http://artinvestment.ru/auctions /1556/records.html? & m []=1285560 & m []=1285540 & m []=1276760

Very good sale, given the current realities ..

Sergeyitch, I was looking for sales Burliuk on Sotebis and Christie in the day.
  I agree that the sale of normal, good work is still sold. What and showed the result of sales.
Internally, glad, and for his work, which had given them up for nothing.
I tried to persuade to sell my work for half price, but I did not agree.
He said that he thanks God for anything to eat there, and then we'll see!

I am also happy for you! How many times convinced that in the sale is valid adage "haste makes waste,".

A Burliuk you think korformistom?

And who was this pro-Soviet scum?

Call the artist and poet David Davidovich Burliuk a rascal you, in my opinion, there is no reason.

And even if you're a creative artist of this attitude is negative, that is no reason vyskazyvatsya in his address this way.

Well, it's a stamp like this: "levoliberalnaya bastard", etc.


And he was prosovok - you have not heard?

And why then hit the road?

Konstantin, and what a "prosovok, what is there to talk to.

Burliuk not sympathetic to the Soviets, and Russia as their homeland.

He came here twice, in 1956 and 1965. But many who came: and Chagall, and Stravinsky.

It is widely known that Burliuk worked with the embassy by the newspaper "Voice of Homeland" and strongly supported the commies and the local Soviet agents of influence.


And he himself was largely a Soviet agent of influence.

"Wide"? How? What this newspaper has published his poems?
"Cooperate" in varying degrees by many. Remember Serebryakov, for example. I do about the history of Efron's and Tsvetaeva too silent.

Added after 1 minutes
[QUOTE="Guriev, Igor; 1368211] Yes, and it was largely a Soviet agent of influence.
[/QUOTE]

[I][B]chatter.[/B][/I]

What is he an "agent of influence"?
Stalin in the U.S. propagate, a plan to kill Trotsky?

[size="1"]Added after 3 minutes[/size]
How?
What are you blah-blah-blah all right?
"Kammunyak" he maintained ...

I do not keep records, but no data are available.
Search will not, they are too well known.
Say, gave an interview to pro-Soviet.

Serebryakov was generally apolitical.
And the other abominations can not justify the abomination alone.

Added after 47 seconds
Well, Stalin's portrait of Burliuk known.
Probably everyone except you.