Buy! Selling?
 

Atte. Administration! Is it time to introduce a system of reputation alone for buyers and sellers of this forum? Got so ridiculous hassle to some negligent contractors, straight horror. All this does not encourage buying on artinvestmente. Status and spasibki "acting now - not revealing. Bad seller must know in person, so as not fired other buyers. How to do it? Let's think together.

Offer!

Create a theme of "Black List Sellers?
Then the reviewers should be the rationale for and signed.

Maybe so.
Perhaps the example of ibeya where there and the reputation of quantitative and qualitative - feedback.

Well, you could for example in the subject line "negligent" link to tell you about these "jitters."
Kill two birds: and warn other potential buyers, and your story will serve as a model for how sellers do not have to do.

But our forum is not an online auction, where they sell every day, and sellers of hundreds, thousands ...

Cyril Syzransky, you think everyone will pick up the theme, initiated by a particular seller? No, you certainly can now reply, "Of course, doing so is necessary, it's business and we are all professionals who buy and sell" but in practice it is not, smotrm a specific predlorzhenie and talk in PM with the same (we think) professional and a responsible seller, but is not so simple. For each image personally do not run over, often relies on a certain level of members of the forum. And the "messy" at times like the experienced, according to the knowledge of the subject and the statements, the sellers. I personally have a bad experience shopping here was three. Of course, pleasant transaction was much more, but the precipitate is ... With that we should fight.

Posted 7 minutes
About that and talking. The thing with artinvestmenta in some circles is regarded as passed some attribution (he had heard - yes sure thing on artinvestmente show. ") Why spoil the reputation?

So you yourself the theme "lift" placing it on your message.

I do not see the problem, ie b.
No one except you is another of your failure communicating with the sellers not raskazhet.

Well yes kind of clear laid out. Let's take the example so graphically. In this topic, in May, I wrote that with the seller to the problem:
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...BE%D0%BD%D0%B8
In senyatbre as you personally are not confused (probably just did not read that topic, or in failing to learn the essence), and you calmly sent let no man of principle, but all the same coin:
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...B0%D1%80%D1%8B
It is just about it - no one will see all positions at all those potential contractors. If it was one subject with specific names and facts, or any trade status in the window containing the personal data - it would have been much visibility. Now what happens next - a man quite a while on the forum, have a reputation, so you can rely on, is not new. In practice is plain situevina, which really does not expect from a man with some experience in this field. Talking now not about the specific example given (although one of the transactions with this seller was extremely unpleasant), but about the whole situation.
PS Once the topic with the reliability of contractors are only interested in me and the admins, and others can not see the problem "can be considered a replica of the topic into the void. Give God all the hassle-free transactions.

You wrote about the "unpleasant difficulties" some.
What were the problems - not just to me, for example, was understood.

That's it. You would not specify, though seemingly a matter of money, your money. Any negative experience has probably alerted. Put a man in a deuce feedbacks for this deal I had nowhere to go, is not provided. Some have asked in a personal (just 2 people). But for most theme party was held. However, why dwell on this example, the long-standing business, there are fresher examples. A matter of principle - whether or not it is necessary to subject the claims to the contractors or the system of trade reputation?

I think - is needed.

Added after 55 seconds
I do not climb someone else's deal, actually.

Grigory,
Subject needs and most importantly reflect not only the negative and positive primery.a + you can just those who bought or sold the mark in the Marketplace section-Buy deal as prshli udoletvoritelno-bad-good (as well as the top section oprosa.anonimno). Hence will then reputation.

This is not exactly reflect the nature of the transaction ... must, in my opinion, to describe more accurately the deal ...
buyer to the seller .. Does the picture of laid out the photo, there are no hidden defects, how reliably a verbal description, as it was packed ... etc.
seller to the buyer. How fast was carried out payment has.
All this will create the discipline of trade sdelki.A negligent or dishonest sellers, as buyers, in Black spmsok.

Here the problem somewhere else that after receiving a negative evaluation of a person may register on the forum under a different name and re-sell.
And if he has a dynamic IP (and there are now a majority), we can not track it.