Vladimr Yakovlev
 

Two works by Vladimir Yakovlev.
1971.
Dimensions are good, I specify.
Technique (most likely gouache on paper) refine too.
Works are in Georgia, in the case of interest can be quickly delivered to Moscow.

What then stomps me this "Yakovlev", but about provenance, know anything?

What's "Ivy in this case?

I, for one, these things are just alarmed.

From these studies the roof is not going and this is really alarming.
Very much they are "tame"

And then I just realized it this way - "stomps" from their tailor, which is not typical for the work of Yakovlev.

 I, frankly, the work also seemed "too good" for Yakovlev. Perhaps they were correct to place to start, see attribution. Provenance I will specify, as soon as the information once it together.

We have Yakovlev Fund:

http://www.yakovlevfond.ru/contact

 
Thanks, I wrote back.

 EVOH as. If someone would be interested in submitted work could be turned to Valery Stanislavovich. To me, they are not on the profile, an acquaintance asked me to help with implementation, and it, in turn, asked his friends in Tbilisi. :)

Well maybe not very well, but everyone understood ;)

We just do not forget that Yakovlev was a man with very severe eye disease, he underwent surgery only in the early 90's.
Unconditional artist's talent, helped him overcome the disease, but also eye disease has left a very peculiar imprint on his work. Further explanation will not, that would not instruct poddelschikov. :D

Sur, certainly from the photo it is impossible to conclude, I think that having a friendly provenasa and consultation V. Silaeva much help. Although I have my doubts.

Ivy, probably because most LRA "herbarium" than painting?
The flowers themselves are some kind of flattened ...

 I myself is not very necessary. If there is a real interest in this work, I am ready to negotiate with potential merchant terms of the transaction. For example, that he would buy me these things, subject to confirmation of authorship, Mr. V. Silaev. It is possible that Mr. Silaev immediately zabrakuet these works when viewing them from photographs.
 Prices can be quite acceptable. If interested please write in a personal or publichku.

Sur, it is likely that this VI Yakovlev.
Better photos can be?

Compare: the first two are your other two with Sotheby's.

I do not believe in these "Yakovlev.

Carrion.

Most of his life Yakovlev was almost blind. Hence, such a rabid (in a good way) in the expressiveness of his paintings. He painted not what he saw as a certain image, which is formed before his mind's eye. Therefore, the easiest way to evaluate his paintings from a position: how could they draw a blind man?

For example, there is a whole constellation of fake Yakovlev, a very even such a typical and beautiful, but with almost the same signatures (which is at once disturbing). Well, secondly, all these studies are very difficult to Yakovlev's background. He could not so apply the paint - just do not see this. By the way, part of the work of this poddelschika flashed on this forum.

With regard to these paintings. Look at the left. Could a blind man to cut around all these flowers? Really not sure. The same argument can be applied to the second picture. Yakovlev generally avoided trace the flowers, especially in the 70th (although it did in the early nineties, when he underwent surgery on his eyes and he began to see). He tried to build a drawing brush strokes, rather than contours. Besides, I do not like serdtsevinki colors. According to my observations, Yakovlev often painted them with dots or strokes of rough, but here they seem emerges. He worked as a simpler, more ...

In general, the works look very unreliable. Although, of course, Silaev say precisely. Send him a picture, perhaps pictures will be enough.