Cazeau auction in Paris
 

December 21 in Paris will be Russian auction auction house Cazeau (Cazo).

There is now an expert Tatiana Barysheva, pushed out of Thuja.

Dominated by Russian books, but there are fine art.

http://www.cazo.fr/

I wonder what they think friends of the portrait, attributed to Petrov-Vodkin, occurring from the collection of S. Schuster?

(He is on the first page of theirs site).

Here it is:

Yuri A. Rusakov believed that this portrait - the work of Petrov-Vodkin.

Of course, she recalls Petrov-Vodkin, but the texture smear - not very similar.
In the Petrov-Vodkin was not as stiff a smear, especially after the revolution (and to date it can be a post-Revolutionary painting, Comrade. Syzran, what do you think?).

Confusing and some applicative person on toxic blue background and the border itself faces and background.

Drawn, of course, amazing, but what can I say for the Petrov-Vodkin?

Igor Sasha, pevoe - I will answer you with a display of examples, but my post had disappeared.
It's a sign.
Since, as a second, you ask the question casually, without pictures, but I have this link on your somewhere out there to dive, flip through the catalog, look at this picture and think, then again, to see go to these links again to seek out one lot, look-look out there something else ... To horseradish goat accordion? Huh?

Good, you want answers, ask the question properly. Annoyed because he found three similar heads (pre-revolution) and his post, apparently, erased because of that torn Sazo.

Tob. Sasha, in my opinion, if you do not analyze, and rely solely on the whole impression of the work - it's not Petrov-Vodkin.
That, of course, does not exclude the possibility that it could be quite the same Petrov-Vodkin, just not very distinctive.
Anyway, if I liked the Petrov-Vodkin, I would not for this fight.

My God, he's opened by one link, and will not have to dive, etc.

A copy of it I just could not, I do not know how to copy it there.

Added after 2 minutes
Here I am about the same.
 
I Petrov-Vodkin's love life they do and how does not seem to feel his way.

Well it is not.

Excellent work, school Petrov-Vodkin.
But it is the same Petrov-Vodkin, like Mantegna, for example.

By clicking on the link opens an auction site, and then have to go to the directory and browse through it to the portrait.
Who needs it?
You or someone else?

I'm not right, Igor Sasha?

Yes, you're wrong, because the portrait on the front page.
What I said in the first message in this thread.

There's only an image without a description of size, technology ...
You may need such details are not important, but I'm here, sorry, they are required to present a thing in real life.

Well, this portrait, there will not be copied, had a roundabout way.


I have it dated from 1925 to 1930.

Offhand - 1927.

Added after 13 minutes
By analogy with portraits Kozintseva (1924) and Andronnikova (1925)?

Well, ask me about things Kuzma Sergeyevich?
This is generally my favorite artist, probably along with Pavel Kuznetsov and, say, Hals and Velázquez and Serov.

Thrilled with the youth, right now grown old, the feelings were dim, but love, love, as I can.

Posted 6 minutes
Well type.
But for me, here plays a role and its value is a special type of luminosity, which is not Bylov these years of painting at anybody.
This luminosity is samohvalovskaya such as "Girls T-shirt" or something.
Therefore, I tend in general to the end of 1920, if not to the beginning of 1930 (prior to 1932 approximately).

But this is not exactly Petrov-Vodkin. I have asked one of his friend, a very thin feel painting, and he immediately and confidently said: no, Petrov-Vodkin.
In such delicate matters as attribution, it is also important, I've noticed.

Although the thing is, once again, lovely.
But who? Who the hell?

Anatoly You are not entitled to 100%, this is the backdrop for many pictures .. K.P.V.

Guriev, Igor, and you have not considered the "candidate" Mary Lomakina (1896 -1964)? Pupil Petrov-Vodkin, it subsequently, everything else, has reached great heights in the genre of portraiture.

In the web quite a bit of her work, but these are the portraits that were published in some editions, in general, correspond to these characteristics.

This is certainly not a statement on my part - just food for thought, to guess))

In 2008, TG was people. Exhibition Mary Lomakina:

http://www.newstube.ru/media/lomakina-v-tret 'yakovke

http://www.tretyakovgallery.ru/ru/ca...hibitions1230/

Spawn at this portrait Schuster was on.
Reckon this portrait of Petrov-Vodkin, in my opinion - is not serious.