Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Costs, valuation, attribution (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Authorship Attribution (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=102822)

Toinen 10-12-2010 13:10

Authorship Attribution
 
1 Attachment(s)
Dear Colleagues,
Landscape back into place.

Oil on cardboard, size 16.5 x 42.5 cm Aragats Byurakan Observatory.
(Built in 1947)

Кирилл Сызранский 11-12-2010 13:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toinen (Post 1427051)
topic.

That there was a landscape with the Observatory in Byurakan?

Toinen 11-12-2010 22:53

Cyril Syzransky, you have a wonderful visual memory!

The fact that the audience interest to the landscape has not arisen, and I lost.

Сима 11-12-2010 22:58

I liked the landscape.
You wasted so hurry, MB
required that the landscape expert just have not found time yet to go to the forum.
And just so you cut off all possibilities.
Return, please let hung.

Кирилл Сызранский 11-12-2010 23:00


Toinen 11-12-2010 23:37

Listened to the opinions of colleagues and returned to the place of the photo scenery.

Кирилл Сызранский 11-12-2010 23:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toinen (Post 1429231)
listen to the opinions of colleagues and returned to the place of the photo scenery.


In the subject Armenian artists ask a question of authorship and a link to your topic.

Toinen 12-12-2010 00:06

Cyril Syzransky, thanks, will do so.

Кирилл Сызранский 12-12-2010 01:57


наследник 12-12-2010 02:01

Toinen, you have the avatar something like ...
Perhaps, this "dance"?
:p

Toinen 12-12-2010 02:03

[QUOTE="Cyril Syzransky; 1429681]I see it, late 60's - early 70's[/QUOTE]


Then our opinions are absolutely identical.
(Not only the date of the film, but the signs of aging)

[size="1"]Added after 5 minutes[/size]
Quote:

Originally Posted by "heir 1429701
Perhaps, this" dance


It would be nice, because
on avatars A. Jawlensky.
It is a pity that time did not hit.

Игорь Гурьев 12-12-2010 02:09

I'd dated a type no later than 1968.

From 1963, for example.


But who knows.


That is, stylistically this is the second third of the 1960's, if not before, but almost someone's particular style and would go beyond the conventional averaged frame.


He was born either in 1910-1916 or after 1934.

Reasons?

I do not know.

Toinen 12-12-2010 02:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by "Guriev, Igor (Post 1429741)
I have dated a type no later than 1968



Type March-April?
:D

artcol 12-12-2010 02:25

3 Attachment(s)
1.
1959

2.
1965

3.
1975

наследник 12-12-2010 03:59

A thousand pardons, but what's the hidden meaning in your pictures displayed?

Compare the style of the time, a palette ...?
Nice, but pointless for the author's declared theme.


All times are GMT +3. The time now is 09:33.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.