Would be interesting to name names ..

I have met in the press information about the Shemyakin (in his American period) and Luce Raven (in Moscow) ..
and all ...

No market , all of this talk. Buy a little. Confusion with the prices. I liked the article ( or interview ) Popov , " must put an end to the term" investment art " intelligent commentary on what is going on ...

Lucky people.
Discuss how to talk with the artist.
NATA, Seriy, Petr - I about you.
And sitting here in the Crimea to call up each other (artists), chatted and happy.
:D> If only one little word art dealer ...
:D>

Sex in the evening spoke by telephone with the Crimean such glushnyak ... Uuuu ...

Subject to this topic ...
:)>

That's me they would be very interesting, but unless someone can say? This mystery is great there .

The fact of the matter is that in Russia the income of artists to speak is not accepted, it seems like bad manners . As if artists are not people , and a such elves feeding pairs of turpentine ..

Therefore, I personally do not understand - working with us , or contractual schemes do not work , and whether they at all?
 I only know that at the dealers , many artists are seen as bloodsuckers slave-owning ... but it's only those who are say, because go " bezkontraktnye ," and those who " contract " (if any) are silent - apparently afraid to dispel so important in our country, ethereal aura of the artist- celestial .

In short, who will raise the veil ? I wonder the same ! :)>

Even if you know the specific names of those who are on contract and with whom they contract , is that something will change ? There are professional ethics, and , if this do not want to extend this relationship by the participants themselves , no one the right to talk about it , right?

I just remind you: http://artinvestment.ru/invest/inter...popoffart.html

I-V, are possible options. For example, I prefer the version of the artist "from scratch " - of course , we are talking about zero visibility and no talent. With them easier to negotiate - they risk nothing and have nothing to lose . They can buy the archive as the basis for an equity investment artdilera - promoter. And with more buzz , if successful, the company - " who was nothing will become everything " , and thanks to you personally , an art dealer. ( Oh , and talent of the artist , of course. While the talent he had before and the success and fame do not was). And more money.

I also had a similar idea ( but with respect to morality , because as a ( whole ) grupki gallerists absolutely did not cause ttorzheniya ( rejection ) a fact dubious , manipulative lies about some of the ( fictional ? underground ? unknown ?) auction ( an old story ) , making logical conclusion is the identity of their level of morality and professionalism.

ps For those who do not understand it 's ugly and unprofessional to lie , it is an axiom (IMHO)

[QUOTE=I-V; 1919581]

Therefore, I personally do not understand - working with us, or contractual schemes do not work, and whether they at all?
 
QUOTE]


Work :)>

IV, I have some thoughts on the matter, will not be able to give very detailed answer, but it would be so short. Western art market is very different from the domestic first of its long lifetime, as well as the number of "interested spectators" that is, the percentage has held collectors, as well as potential. Economic status and financial capabilities of most of these "interested", and the sheer number of "interested in" art - all this is disproportionately higher in comparison with the Patriotic. the citizens.
Yes, and state. support the entire system (already existing) art in the West, it is also not comparable to the domestic, and it affects the interest and etc. etc.

In Russia must still develop only, and the more people will be involved in this the better for all in the future.
And artists, writers differ from the course, the writers are working on a project which has a circulation, and the artist, each piece is unique.

K. Mahler, I just read an interview with Popov , a lot of smart signals. He reiterated his offer to invest in their present artists, while not mentioned those in which the proposed invest - esche3 5 years ago . Who of his new artists do you think is attractive, and we remember about them in 5 years?

Especially the word "professional" smiled :)> ...
(And in particular in the context being discussed ... :)>)

Joseph , I think an artist from scratch , zanematsya not profitable. The sheer quality of the artist is debatable if he did not himself pokazal.I where even his accidental promotion, his work must find time to throw in time is like a pyramid MMM. Hurt your reputation , and money will not make - the zero- artist the more investments in its public relations .

I think I realized that I had in mind iosif, and I even agree with him , on the other hand, all artists, once started from scratch , and all of them had the experience of the first exhibition , which is usually a failure if no one helps in the organization. And so with the help of the dealer \\\\ promoter \\\\ gallerist this first exhibition can be turned into a success.

But why ? The first exhibition I have been super successful, without a dealer \\\\ promoter \\\\ gallery owner , the next worse. :)>