"Brow" - a person, the front part of the head, so just call and arched opening in front of the Russian stove.

It is true , especially in the late Soviet period .
But there was an archetype in the unconscious , " the beggar and the crummy intellectual ," he may have formed in the 20-30 or even earlier.
Now , this archetype is changing in a positive direction, closer to the image of a businessman and biznesledi . I do not know what is the basis idea of ​​the intellectuals as a " rogue " in the description does not.

What we are talking about different things. In a word, I put an educated sense of the Soviet intelligentsia, old regime, so to speak. Do you deny that many of them are now in the age of thieves and Rvachev, were not rogue by income level? I know many people in higher education, especially for 50 years, who are now unemployed for many years, especially among women there are many. I do not know how to Armenia. In Russia, the unemployment rate is smaller and not so tragic it looks. Although if they come to power, young reformers <! - ~ 7 ~ ->, remember dashing 90.
And the intellectuals is yes. Now we have a lot of intellectuals divorced, especially a lot of flashes in different TV entertainment show to the jury. But if he admits his intellectual vulgarity, it is not an intellectual. It's me again about the same TV show. An intellectual, in my concept, a moral category. An educated man, an intellectual can not be intellectual. Although he and "a suit sitting" and the salary is good. Yeah, well-groomed nails that were <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

[QUOTE="Posav; 2087551 ']Yeah, well-groomed nails that were <! - ~ 7 ~ ->[/QUOTE]

[B][I][COLOR="Navy"]can be nice man

And think about the beauty nail ...[/COLOR][/I][/B] (a) :D

I often hear it, but if the intelligence of the moral category, then it is not at all to prove or disprove it is impossible, because it turns out that the people who make up the standard of living is not power, not an oligarchy, and the middle class - not moral. If we extend this logic to arrive at the absurd because it is not necessary.

When I speak of the intellectuals, I mean the same guy who makes a living mental labor, rather than a good and decent steelworker. I think most of it and understand it. Assume that the unemployed and the poor necessarily superior to the moral and personal qualities normally earn an intellectual, a kind of "snobbery in reverse."
And in the description of the image of the intellectual and an intellectual in an average 30%of respondents used the adjectives: kind, honest, responsible, "his /her all the love and respect." It is normal to describe a set of intellectual, is not it?
P.S. Well-groomed nails should be in all cases, it is not even discussed. <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

In Dostoevsky there are a lot of begging - poverty , he said, yes, not a vice but beggary - a vice, is unique.
He even has the time somewhere , that he a man who died from starvation would be dug up and strangled with their own hands again. <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

There is an aristocracy - nobility . And there are the intelligentsia - the commoners . This is a matter of fact . Is it possible to disassemble and aspects .

PS That is, People are good, but do not have a history of family - a family experience , just personal experience. Well, the cattle do live one day.

Clay Foundation (beef)


 <! - 7 ~ ~ -> <! - 7 ~ ~ -> <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

Added after 3 minutes
Rather, too, commoners.
Added after 21 minutes
Milan, but who is it , in today's Russia , it has a history of the race?
Are you kidding ? His great-grandparents did not know , but a little earlier - at Scoop , often even of grandparents are not remembered , rewrote his biography in order to Solovki in the Gulag is not so pleasing as a class- alien element .
That's now starting some crumbs of the ancestors to gather and even then, I must say, invented for the most part , to the nobility of your trying to lean on .
And yet , one must remember that in Russia, the hereditary privileges were canceled the February Revolution of 1917 - all , there's no graphs, Duke and other Dukes died.

Well, it does not matter . Throw the extra essence. For Czarist Russia is quite an assumption .

Educated commoner, earning a living is not physical (ie, mental ) labor. At the same time an intellectual , he might not be, and exist in a perfectly psevdointelektualnoy environment , as long as decency have been satisfied.

Intellectual - a purely Western notion, born on the same basis of Western rationalism and ethos " prometeevschiny " (though mb and we have precedents in Kievan Rus', perhaps) . They may be a commoner and an aristocrat .

That is, Intellectual ,=intelligent .
That is, immanent quality of personal and belonging to a certain layer.

Posted 1 minute
And yet I say to you about something else , my dear . Do not be so literally all perceive.

No, it is important and very.

No, not "common people", as an educated citizen, extracting corn mental labor.

Commoners - the best people of Russia in the XIX century, I believe.

Added after 3 minutes
And about what?


What do you want?
I am your allusions, reminiscences and associations do not understand, they are yours.
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->

Not the fact that the citizen . What about mental - too many nuances in quality and results - is a creative , there are management . What is mental ? This blabla ? May not understand <! - ~ 3 ~ ->

You are now in our work are doing mental or physical ? Or at all - enjoying yourself ? <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

For me, all good in their own way.

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 56 seconds[/color]
I'm aware of <! - ~ 7 ~ ->
The magic words suggestion , then, behold - also works, all written in the subcortex .

Communicate.
<! - ~ 7 ~ ->

That's a teacher, too - talking <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

Teacher earns money.

And maybe do it for free.