Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство

Форум по искусству и инвестициям в искусство (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/index.php)
-   Chatter (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=116)
-   -   Images of the alphabet (https://forum.artinvestment.ru/showthread.php?t=166292)

Магнолия 22-08-2012 21:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stanislavsky , 2215011"
looked through

By whom? Blind and deaf ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stanislavsky , 2215011"
How, I'm sorry, do you guys

How , I'm sorry , you manage to be rude party forum?

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 10 minutes[/color]
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzran ; 2215131"
It was not a question but a famous quote .

It was a sign of lazy authorship. When quoting the author points out .

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzran ; 2215131"
Well this is how I need to live ?

Live happily ever after.

Added after 21 minutes
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jasmin; 2215231"
Read Spinoza

And Spinoza is not outdated ? Share criteria check writers "on freshness"

fabosch 23-08-2012 00:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Magnolia (Post 2215521)
How , I'm sorry , you manage to be rude party forum?

Even just curious. If you , dear , do not think that's rudeness
Quote:

Originally Posted by Magnolia (Post 2214531)
But understanding such as Art-lover is not available ...
I could fill this list with hundreds of names, of which Art-lover never heard ...

,
then what you find objectionable in the words Stanislavski?
Please cite what you saw boorish ?
Really that's this simple statement of fact:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stanislavsky (Post 2215521)
How, I'm sorry, do you manage to write in the " academic" way, incomprehensible to me .

?

Магнолия 23-08-2012 07:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by fabosch; 2215791"
Just curious even .

If curious , your first try on for abusive tirade Art-lover to my address ( entry number 53) and rudeness Stanislavsky (entry number 58), and then, for example , ask who understands surrealism (there is a theme).

One of the themes of the exhibition, I komplimentno surprised that such an intelligent man was among the " not able to enter " in the subject "Images alphabet." In response, he came at me like a dog. Stanislavsky joined. How, in your opinion, should I respond if I had only the words?

Added after 1 hours 36 minutes
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stanislavsky , 2215011"
It is hard to imagine anyone other than you took seriously the issue seriously as Cyril and answered it .

Now it is clear that you are not a serious set. Then I advise you , for you, this subject is not to look.

Кирилл Сызранский 23-08-2012 11:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Magnolia , 2215901"
If curious , your first try on for abusive tirade Art-lover to my address ( entry number 53) and rudeness Stanislavsky (entry number 58 )

You will excuse me, too exaggerating .

Quote:

Originally Posted by Magnolia , 2215901"
In response, he came at me like a dog.

This is not easy to go too far .

Out of it : me, a long-standing forum members, you can not even read " record number 53 " and " record number 58 " , to understand the obvious - or Art- lover, or Stanislavski can not just be rude .
You might call them rudeness ironic tone ? So the irony of many of your buddies on the forum there , sorry .

Магнолия 23-08-2012 13:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cyril Syzran (Post 2216101)
you, I'm sorry, too exaggerating.


Cyril, you're on any scale kicks weigh these bullies?

Art-lover and Stanislavsky rude just do not know how rude sophisticated.

Кирилл Сызранский 23-08-2012 13:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Magnolia (Post 2216311)
Cyril, you are on the scale which kicks weigh these bullies?


Not all ...

Magnolia, I'm sorry, but I will not answer at all and continue to engage with you in conversation.
All.

Магнолия 23-08-2012 17:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jasmin; 2215231"
then alchemy was pseudoscience.

This ignorant Sovdepiia announced alchemy pseudoscience. Serious scientists know that was a long process of accumulation of experimental data, is very expensive, which can be obtained under the promise to find a way to get gold.
It was very difficult to understand the degree of stability of matter, until all "all" is not divided into components (molecular) and simple (elemental) particles of matter. After the establishment of the terms "element" and "chemical reaction" name "alchemy" is left as the stage of studies of various substances.

I'll pay attention to this explanation, because according to the philosopher L.Vitgenshteyna (and not only) semantic system similar to the system of education variety of substances. Like this: elements of letters form ion-phonemes, of which molecules are synthesized speech, etc.
The key to understanding the relationship between physical and semantic worlds is the "property" as a bridge between physics and metaphysics - coding properties of (natural principles) letters.
Clarity will be gradual, as they review the images alphabet.
Sorry, all at once is not possible.

Art-lover 23-08-2012 19:22

My nickname is so much remembered that I could not come hardly <- ~ 4 ~ ->.
Start trouble Mann <! - ~ 12 ~ ->:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manna (Post 2194571)
Magnolia, do not judge strictly. Personally, I can not "enter" not only in the "image effect Alphabet", but in the very essence of the numerous passages of your essay (which you give to the forum). She (the essence) escapes me .... Well maybe education is not enough ...

I said, "Sibo" for this sample delicate care from useless discussions. It is obvious that the recipient accepted the statement of manna literally seeing it and signatories to acknowledge one's ignorance.

Soon in my reportage, where one of the images are accompanied by texts 3. "Starling" Fred Tomaselli (USA). Critics trace the ancestry of Ptah up to "The Raven" by Edgar Allan Poe., there was a message from Magnolia.
Here is the conversation test completely because it illustrates the methodology distinguished author of "image Alphabet":

Quote:

Originally Posted by Magnolia, 2209621"
views, and most importantly, after reading such great photos, I can not understand how the Art-lover was among the "not able to enter" in the mysticism of the question. He writes about the genealogy of Ptah ("SLE OR ECA") up to "Thief it" by Edgar Allan Poe. In my opinion, and heard, and seen. But the picture also with the idea of ​​t Thief Celebrate linked.
Just a theme of the exhibition "Persha kiivska mizhnarodna bienale suchasnogo Mistetstvo."

Quote:

Originally Posted by Art-lover; 2210601"
Sorry, but Fred Tomaselli, the authors discuss the pictures, too, will not be able to drive. Because in his native English, "starling" is spelled "Starling" and in consonance associated with asterisks instead of "The Raven" E.Po., and not with the "creation".
So, it is not "in the theme of the exhibition," and the style of thinking in your poetic imagination "Images of the alphabet." )
See you there.

This episode was the second reason, which led me to this topic.

The first is that I sympathize with people with similar interests.
Awkward way to participate in the forum - poorly substantiated allegations expansion outward, focusing on its role in science, etc. - Fatally leads to the fact that the website will begin to beat.
And they began - and tough.
Sometimes the severity justified: Members still nervous shudder, remembering Eternity, terrorize forum teosofoidnoy advertising "genius" bad zhnika, commercial agent which it was. But this is not the case.
People whose troubles Derivability simplicity and metaphysical passion, do not deserve the cruelty and mockery.
But what they can to help in a situation where they - unwittingly - provoke conflicts?
Suggest a range of activities in which their positive qualities could get the best incarnation.
Call a spade a spade, even if it is unpleasant, and to show that you can respond to the inadequacy without coarseness.
Thought that my post will serve in this regard Magnolias kind of "safe conduct" and will help solve its problems with the community.
And, it seems, was not mistaken: opponents in this thread have become more tolerant of each other.
Well, with one insignificant exception):
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Magnolia, 2215901"
One of the themes of the exhibition, I komplimentno surprised that such an intelligent man was among the "not able to enter" in the subject "Images of the alphabet." In response, he came at me like a dog.


Fed 23-08-2012 19:47

What a fun to deal with time boxes eniem words:

Al-vacant lot in the French law, taken over a Russian measure of the area;

catch-the soul of Zyryans.

Ie
Art lover-wasteland soul.
<- ~ 11 ~ ->

fabosch 23-08-2012 21:19

All this " game of words and letters " ( otherwise it is difficult to call occupation ) of our wonderful companion really reminds me of " guessing " no less remarkable girl Laura.

True latter somehow seems to me more innocuous.

Thus worthy of all the attention the dialogue that takes place between now friend from the city and the aforementioned P. wonderful girl , from which let me quote one remark again mentioned above (but not above mentioned girl) friend :

Quote:

Originally Posted by Igor Guryev (Post 2202761)
I see in your " guessing " at least there was some sense in the last three , but people want something still there, so that sense too.
But - my sorrow is light (with )

Want in this thread of the same dialogue ...
Especially about the sadness well. Here it is also bright.
Please , Magnolia, do not swear ...


All times are GMT +3. The time now is 03:11.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.