Цитата:
Сообщение от Marusya
(Сообщение 1397661)
I do not think so.
Very highly recommend: I. Kabakov. "60-70's. Memoirs of informal life in Moscow," Moscow, 2008
There - very little of the usability, but about their fears and insecurities do not hesitate to write.
Still fairly detailed description of when, what work is done, and who they may be, that, you, in our time almost that provenance.
He is a very interesting classification of artists, it's not that contradict the classification Grobman, but built on a different principle and criteria. Explains a lot in terms of "like - not like", not in the sense of art and public and social significance.
|
You are referring to Kabakov duplicity? Everyone knows that children's literature then had huge numbers and salaries, and work there had to be a big pull. What kind of persecution in question, if all the prosecution could fit on leave from work?
You can write anything but facts are stubborn things.
Added after 11 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от Cyril Syzran
(Сообщение 1397171)
Where do you find just such a game?
I had a word of this type do not believe ... :D
|
And I do not just believe I do not believe I just saw. It does not concern an artist, it was at all. The artists had a lot of revenue, to name a few. When a diplomat was leaving, taking a plane donated paintings. Suffice it to say 6%of gross income on culture. I mean professional artists, graduated from Special Account. institution. Always had a lot of amateurs and they always have big ambitions. |
