![]() |
Цитата:
And in such optics I would liken senior fellow teachers - local governments : they had the word, and had the power at their level. The same Guttuzo . But besides him were respected comrades . That's it. |
Цитата:
I do not have money - finally muttered Vorobyaninov . - Who does not ? - Ostap asked very quietly . - I have . - A hundred rubles ? - I ... um ... n - m - lost . Skip the half-page : Ostap approached Vorobyani close and looking back at the sides, the leader gave a short , strong and invisible to the outside eye jab in the ribs. - Here's the police ! Here's the high cost of chairs for working people of all countries! Here's your night walks to the girls ! Here's a touch of gray in his beard ! Here's a lusty ! Vorobyaninov of all time execution made no sound . From the side , it seemed that a respectful son talking with his father , but his father is too busy shaking his head. ( A ) <! - ~ 9 ~ -> |
Artcol, I'm talking to you seriously, your words are not cheated, and you start to wriggle out of the blue. Ugly ...
Why would you think that Цитата:
And then - what does "Guttuzo manner?" With the same success you can write - manner of Renoir, Van Gogh's style, manner of Matisse, etc. The conversation that is not the issue. We are talking about some common terms that characterize the work of a number of artists, their work brings together some kind of "style" that you want to select, and somehow call. It's obvious. Well you build yourself from PTUshnikom? If you already started about Guttuzo (you, not me!), Then you have created a new art history term - "manner Guttuzo" long called the "Italian neo-realism", which with the passage of time in different countries, was further developed as neoobektivizm, neonaturalism, hyperrealism, etc. And the Soviet Union is no exception. We were also influenced by it. Influence is called the "severe style". Bad or good, the name is. But, apart from that and yet - what? What specific terminology can you offer? I am afraid that no. In addition abracadabra Цитата:
|
Цитата:
It is interesting to see who else from the artist was awarded the prize . So: 1962 - Picasso , Pablo (Spain); 1963 - Niemeyer, Oscar ( Brazil); 1964 - Bidstrup , Herluf ( Denmark); 1966 - Manz , Giacomo (Italy); 1967 - Siqueiros ( Alfaro Siqueiros ), David ( Mexico); 1968 - Effel , Jean ( Francois Lejeune ) ( France); and in 72 - Guttuso Renato ( Italy) , everything. |
Цитата:
All - grands ! |
Цитата:
|
O painting style and manner of writing .
There is still such : "forced realism" There are "realistic interpretation" "figurative" ( this is all that is not an abstraction , and can be learned ( more or less ) - as understood by professional art dealers in Britain. Still there is "narrative" - ( literally: the story ) is how it would be possible for the picture ( realistic or approximate ) guess "what is " and invent " " what would that be " ( my interpretation ) Picture falls under all four definitions , but it all depends on what ( and " who benefits " (C) .. That is what purpose is requested definition ... <! - ~ 1 ~ -> |
| Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 05:00. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.