I have seen that Pavel finally decided to switch to the language of his grandfather Shchukarev. :D
- here and say nothing. I kept immaculately in advance I know - my grandfather cut
Shchukarev and instructive raised index finger. - Here I'll tell you one mishap at a time, and everything will come to clarity, and any disputes will no longer need.

Well this is a self-a! I do not cherish illusions, I see the end result ..
Importantly, the moral and financial goal put the organizers ..

Once the exhibition kakogoto famous artist, I caught myself thinking that all work the same as a wall. Like an artist is good and Pervan work too, and then the wall. Ravnodushie.Potom on creative giving I realized how everything is done. For two months chepovek The outline takes hundreds of pictures. He earns quite different, but to get the title or something to him, good man give an exhibition and a summer residence. At the exhibition come all, brandy river, a good man becomes a national or an academician. This poor guy, he thinks he has reached, and the exhibition all say that the works are empty, but in the eyes of praise, give flowers.
Man fooling himself, and now everyone will be jealous of a talented artist. He himself was never able to do anything.

Found what bake! (About everything then you, Pavel, little head hurts ...)

I think that you would not have agreed to many outstanding artists, including your favorite (and mine too), the French Impressionists. Think self-portraits by Renoir, Van Gogh ... or excellent "Landscape with House and plowman" Van Gogh in the GoE. I think its size 30x40 or a little more ... It is not in the amount of work, and that is whether the artist what to say.
Much work - another problem ... And you know that better than me. Just today, for commerce is really better - large size - 1m or more. But this requirement has galleries, but not the problem of the artist

Do not share the name of a famous painter. Perhaps the exhibition was the last year or a couple of years. Otherwise how could he became famous

Huntress Renoir, Luncheon on the grass, Monet, Courbet ... Van Gogh also increased the size, and after a great little write-a pleasure.

no one says that the smaller the work, the less art. But the opposite-the more the size of the work, the great skill is required - true. Al just think it is a purely mechanical increase, more paint, no big picture is arranged differently, you do not understand, until he can not write.
In Van Gogh have a job (she was burned during the Second World) - go to the artist sketches. There, the artist as a camel laden with huge canvases.
Van Gogh is often 70-80 per meter. But there are also larger.

That recall, in connection large format .. When OGHU learned, not remember why. but I had to write a big portraits of the CC (not curriculum) .. Canvas gave (probably teach halturku no time) ..
Now we have (with hindsight) I think so ..
So, this experience has taught not to be afraid of big sizes .. (Glory to the CPSU!)

On a big canvas, he wrote a lot of small ones.
The largest size-30 is 72h92