[QUOTE=Jasmin;3376821]Why should I give some "definitions", to draw You closer to "the truth"?:) Read the topic, look for the truth. [I]Road will overcome idosi@
See, Jasmin, thank you. I was talking about intentional rudeness, it is pleasant to communicate without it, you will agree :).

[QUOTE=ANATOLY;3376211]went Every day and admired masterpiece estetiki@

The answer is not correct.

She saw him only once in my life.

Black Square is so "strong" that it doesn't show people. Show a copy of which relate to the original as the Mona Lisa with a reproduction of the Mona Lisa.

Alas, but talk about the Royal Baby with a straight face people who have never felt...

However, they were whistling the Bergmans.

People, what are you talking about???

No, I assume that you still, black ink. Rainbow, Parker or Pelikan. They're all the same.

But some very good features one black from another...

YOU PEOPLE????

How can YOU discuss something you never saw?!!

PS the Question is rhetorical. Forum-Russian, right? And we have the custom to argue about the taste of pineapple with those who ate.

[QUOTE=Jasmin;3376821]Why should I give some "definitions", to bring.. to "true"?:) Read the topic, look for the truth. [I]Road will overcome idosi@

I.e., you can easily appreciate the opinion of another person, as greeting, and to Express their shy :) ?
Be it ever so humble person :). Reminiscent of the Soviet ".. there is an opinion..".

[QUOTE="Гриф;3377221"]Forum-Russian, right? And we have the custom to argue about the taste of pineapple with those who El@

If so proud of his "we", then slightly open face.
Where a profile is not specified. Shy father's house?

Decode the meaning of this text.

[QUOTE="Гриф;3377221"]Black Square is so "strong" that it doesn't show ludem@
Of course not show, you will see immediately go blind. You probably one of those people who think they know something that others will never know, the same Konchalovsky. Make a fetish of any subject and run with it like over a new toy. Better about square not tell what made it Konchalovsky. Nothing personal-it's business.

Here are my opinions on different occasions so that You read - do not read. Already since 2009.:)
Although Yes - modest I am.:)

[QUOTE=ANATOLY;3377761]of Course do not show, you will see immediately go blind. You probably one of those people who think they know something that others will never know, the same Konchalovsky. Make a fetish of any subject and run with it like over a new toy. Better about square not tell what made it Konchalovsky. Nothing personal-it Biznes@

You know, Anatoly... I (personally) don't care. But I trudge with how many people who consider themselves problemname, dare to blather on about the Cheka, which they have not seen and will never see.
For...
Now, say black.
There are black ink "rainbow". There are black ink "Parker".
I quite admit that you select the "Parker".
But, there savvy people. For them, black ink Parker - as for You - "rainbow".
Sucks.


I don't know what the paint (black) used Malevich... But You (as you appear to be) a great expert... And versed in black ink better all kaligrafos China and Japan in the black carcass.
Yes?

(I trudge with you, dear editorial..) (C)

PS Tolik... You rare "scoop"... when You Khrushchev were born? And now live in Haifa, Yes?

[QUOTE=Konstantin;3377641]Decode the meaning of this text@

Meaning: people do not show sacral objects. If You got a ticket in the Diamond Fund - there copies.

YOU (all) can't speak for or against the Cheka Malevich, when none of YOU have never ( and will never in the future have not seen and will not see it?!!!!

Was.
What are you all trying to say?????

you can recognize the Cheka sacred or not sacred ?

the fretboard ... and than you is different from you ? ...