No one in the square does not understand.
If perhaps, to samplerobot statements Paola Volkova (from the movie) and the Patriarch...
But what and who we need to take - I will not say.
:cool:

[QUOTE="Гриф;3375001"]No one in the square not ponimaet@

's not true. It is not necessary for all.

[QUOTE=Магнолия;3375021]'s Not true. No need for vseh@

Ah, Yes... But you see much more than it actually is!
99% of what you think about it never was!
:D

For someone who goes to exhibitions from time to time, he rightly believes that there's nothing in it; one who is versed in the art also understands that there's nothing in it, but he knows why and when he appeared and what meaning it carries, and aesthetic beauty to look for it makes no sense, just it's not there.

Question: how many times the "Black square" saw Paola Volkova?
;)

Paula D. Volkov (23 July 1930, Moscow - March 15, 2013) - Soviet and Russian art critic, historian of culture. Honored art worker of the RSFSR (1991).

I very controversial and very linnamo opinion the most Belski similar Cheka not Avtorskie copies, and the Kaaba...

That , in principle, and serves as a background to the speech of the Patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church.
"I feel you, but can't understand..." (Unit)

[QUOTE=Кирилл Сызранский;3373981]...через the year after the Olympics in Sochi, where the opening ceremony started with a reel on the Russian alphabet in which the letter "M" was the word ' Malevich".

How long has it been, and most importantly - completely different strane@
It was recently in the same country.

You perceive that the words of the Patriarch literally? As a child, which my uncle ( the Patriarch) shows two pictures: one beautiful ( icon); the other is not,... Yes and no picture at all ( H. K.)

The Patriarch speaks about the Cheka, how about: "it reflects the spirit of the age". At the opening of the Olympic games, the history of the country was also shown by the symbols that characterize certain historical periods.
[QUOTE="Гриф;3375001"]No one in the square not ponimaet@
On the contrary, the Cheka understand everything, but each in its own way.

[QUOTE="Гриф;3375841"]I very controversial and very linnamo opinion the most Belski similar Cheka not Avtorskie copies, and Kaaba@

Opinion is indisputable. The Kaaba is the integral of the Cheka, or CHK - differential Kaaba.

[QUOTE=Магнолия;3375971]Opinion is indisputable. The Kaaba is the integral of the Cheka, or CHK - differential Kaaba@

We universities were not finished... And integral with the differential will not do it... Even derived in the limit forgot how to take...
But, recognize that the Cheka, the reduction are the same for square and stone.

PS IMHO. This projection. And Malevich made more close... But nothing spare. What did Malevich long gone.
Cheka Malevich and nyneshnij canvas - correlate similarly to Christ and Turin the shroud of Christ.
"Here is the canvas. On it lay Christ.../ This is fiction! There was not such!" (C)
Something like that.

This is the image that Truth leaves a trace in the material world.