Semen Semenovich, ie, when mice eat now, they are distinguished by Rembrandt and Pupkin? type-"Thu Pupkin wrote dryly, drily!

Added after 40 minutes
DSF, the art market has always been, and when the craters in the ancient Greek figures cover and sold more than simple, and when artists competed for a place court painter. In the Renaissance was already ordering system, from the Church is to train all the money! Each church would get a better artist, every artist a better order. Michelangelo general lomil not like a child, and what you want, said the Pope, I'll show the genius and my creations will outlive your reputation, pay more! All the works of Michelangelo, it is jobs for the money. Free artist did not create.

And he did it with childhood-so was his nose and broke-(saying a lot)

Judging from all over the man was a fierce, uncompromising.

.. and besides, gay ( "sodomite", for Russian), and in addition with ADD (attention deficit-cm. my "Acuna-Matata")

NATA NOVA, I think Michelangelo completely unattainable and unfathomable genius.

And who can argue? I also believe. I like him even as it is closer than Leonardo (despite the arrogant character) .. Maybe because of that. that shit did not invent ...

But, we're with you - not the mouse. Person is given a head to get into it any thought, settled their knowledge ... No, I definitely do not agree on the mouse.

Semen Semenovich, that's what I said, the picture appears in the human mind, the viewer's head. All this beauty, the drama, text-subtext-it occurs in the head of the viewer. No spectator mice have evaluated objectively, what it really is, flax oil, ocher, the newspaper ..

How do you understand! ...

Added after 2 minutes
That is, only "mouse" (trademark) approach .... Who is he reminds me of ....

But interestingly, I read a book Merezhkovsky "Resurrected Gods Leonardo da Vinci" So, in the view of Michelangelo Leonardo was Dandy, because he is unpopular with the church and private customers. Michelangelo was rich and successful, and otherwise potokal customers.

Veronic, I wrote exactly what I think-I mean work of Leonardo, Raphael, but Michelangelo's art is, IMHO, beyond the comprehension of the human brain.

A book about Leonardo read .. "Similarly,"! (they were all such spineless politicians themselves ... guess who). And we must live!
A competing (in competition), they are constantly in my ..

The Church made the right choice - Leonardo all have long been used to disperse and shabby.

He was a great experimenter, and the church needs a quality product first ...

Sorry, misled, this opinion was about Leonardo Raphael.

Let's try to quote from the book, perhaps it will be interesting.

"" Happy Boy "... attained fame, wealth, honors like playing ... Cardinal Bibby had spoken for her niece, but he bided his time, as he himself promised a cardinal's purple ... His face, although all of the same child, innocent and senseless for several less than before, like a cherub face - barely noticeable filled out, dull and flabby ... never happened to him from leaving the house without having an honorable retinue of fifty men, so that each of those visits resembled a triumphal procession. "

"This newcomer from Urbino, - read a novel by Dmitry Merezhkovsky" Resurrected Gods "- a dreamy boy with the face of the Immaculate Madonna, who appeared an angel flying down to earth, as perfectly suited their worldly affairs: painted stables Roman banker Agostino Chigi, prepared drawings for its utensils, dishes and plates of gold, which he treats after the Pope, threw into the Tiber, so that they are not used to anyone ..... littered with work, denied everything. But petitioners do not desist, osozhdali it. long since he had no time to finish their works, was just beginning, did two or three smears, and immediately conveyed to his disciples, who caught up and finished the like on the fly. Raphael's Center has made great factory, where shrewd businessman turned the canvas and paint in hard cash, with unbelievable speed, with a market insolence . Rumor has announced him as the greatest artist of all ages and nations: Rafael became the god of painting.
And detrimental to the future of art than discord and chaos of Michelangelo, was this easy harmony Sanzio, academically dead deceitful intent. "

"Leonardo had a presentiment that for the two peaks of Michelangelo and Raphael, there is no way for the future, then break, emptiness. And at the same time conscious of how much both owe him: they took from him the science of light and shade, anatomy, perspective, knowledge of nature, man - and coming out of it destroyed him. "