It should be noted that two weeks with little to selling me this she went out with expertise Grabar Center undoubted certificate forgery. And this fact was just hidden. Then he went to study belt , where it was noted that it was a fake , which could be performed only with the original. Which, incidentally , is stored in the belt in the vaults . Then this picture took two more independent judicial examination. But Ms. Basner still " rest assured ", as almost hagiographic concludes " Leo ."

Or here is a snippet : "Besides Vasiliev announced that the painting" The restaurant "from the collection in Okuneva belt carefully hid and did not show even Tamara Galeeva , the author of a monograph on Boris Grigoriev . Just recently , on February 18 this year , she Galeeva this conspiracy does not confirm approval Vasilyeva - her picture showed . That is hard Vasilev creates criminal plot by lies. "

Let me quote from a letter I Galeeva Tamara , dated June 11, 2011 and sent by the response received from the pictures me : " Send me all the details and specifications of work , and, if possible , the expertise and Grabar Russian Museum. As I recall, in the belt was no such thing - maybe, they did not so long ago bought ? "

Separate subject presentation Mr. " Pushin ' about ethics expert activity : " Actually, the non-disclosure of names of participants of the transaction is the basis of its confidentiality. So accepted . That is, the names of experts buyers do not ask the mediators and mediators are not called . Such is the usual ethics in relationships . "
Maybe this "ethics" and go to the place where Mr. functions " Pushin ', but competent expert opinion , it seems to me , is not accepted to hide in any kind of activity . Especially that Ms. Basner just did not act as a specialist , and was a common member of the trading chain. And strictly classified. Ie by definition, no expert was not.

But the most amazing thing - it started disincarnation Mr. Aronson : "The investigation and might ask . As well as by Aronson : if he is not a front face , the owner whether he works Grigorieva , whether it came Aronson , not a man who identified himself as Aronson , who for Aronson , possibly hiding ? But why is this honesty Aronson and all his acts is now responsible Basner ? "

Something tells me that it is of interest to Mr. Aronson investigation and led to the arraignment, Ms. Basner . However, this is only speculation .
It is not necessary , however, to mourn Aronson . Journalist confidence returns it to the living world : "I have received independent confirmation that the summer of 2009, Aronson came to St. Petersburg and many reported paintings ."

That's really interesting. Can I apply for questioning to ascertain the names of these "many" ?
In this publication are plenty of judgments egregious comment about the need , but probably elsewhere.

And I I achieve only one thing - an open and public trial . But we somehow court is synonymous with condemnation, commercial mediation called expertise , and implementation of the legal rights of the injured , some obviously believe violence. How to live with ?
But despite this outrageous " killer" in the context of it, in my opinion, in the singular , and there is a deep meaning. Elena Basner really threatened. But not from me and not from the Investigative Committee , and from the people who brought her a fake picture and that for some reason it has been carefully preserved . Their freedom and well-being depend on it . That's just scary ...
Andrey Vasilyev

« I'm interested in a passage from a letter Andrey Vasilyev ...»

I'm interested in a passage from a letter Andrey Vasilyev - that Tamara Galeeva ( Ph.D., Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Cultural Studies , Ural State University , author of the book "Boris Dmitrievich Grigoriev ") had not seen the painting " restaurant " in the belt .

Here is a letter from Tamara Galeeva February 18, 2014 :
"<... > I must admit I do not know where Vasiliev took that I have not shown this work in the timing - I think we talked about this with him said . She , indeed, was not included in my album , but not because I did not know about it , but because the publisher could not get it to slide . In the original list has been publishing work . Obviously , the Russian Museum asked for a decent amount of each slide , and the publisher had to abandon a number of works , including from this.

As for the work itself , I 've seen it myself in the collections of graphics , obviously, in the mid -1980s ( not found in the archive exact date - I'm in funds belt worked repeatedly ) . I then all drawings Grigorieva kindly showed keeper graphics - seems E. Selizarova . True, Selizarova told me that as long as the work is not published by the museum , I can not publish them . What I calmed down . "
Letter T. Galeeva , dated February 19, 2014 :

"<... > I have read through the material in the magazine" City 812 "- how it 's awful! Relatively Vasiliev. We were , indeed, corresponded with the work , but I did anything bad about the Russian museum and its staff did not write . And even more so this story that I have not shown the work - is he so interpreted my words. In my last letter Vasilyev about work, I wrote that the collection Okuneva saw a long time and I do not remember , looked like cardboard " café ." I only complained that Russian Museum did not want to draw me to the organization of the exhibition , but the will of the museum , so to speak . This concludes our chat over ( it was June 11, 2011 ) .

The third letter - from March 5, 2014
" It must be remembered that I forgot because the job that saw her almost thirty years ago in the pre-digital age , I have not had a chance to take a picture ."
TG "

Michael Zolotonosov ,

http://www.online812.ru/2014/03/12/008/