Samvel! Photos are very good, life. As well, when you're not tied to the house. I would have went and just took off. I love to photograph. But just take off almost at home, on the property where I live now. It is therefore very little use photoshop. Very much outdoor shooting. Thank you for the pleasure. Maiga.

Added after 5 minutes 19 minutes
Few of the old:
http://www.maigabargior.artspan.com/...3531/MOSCOW%20 -%20LIFE%20FOR%20SALE /

BAGIRA, Do you have a quality site, photos of butterflies are very good. I am not a photographer, and he did it the first time, I am glad that you liked. Is there a demand for photos? How often do you sell them?

Thank you, Samvel! Sales are now very difficult. Basically only suggestions to bring his exhibition-gallery. Even in Venice offers. But I am not visiting, I can not. Worked only at home (from his site), or when I go home to Moscow.

in photography - as in painting, the value of the image is determined primarily by the author's name (and here - of course - a combination of exhibitions, a presence in museums and sales - even though we have photographers that I know - no statistics), in addition - are important circulation , author \\ author does not print. source - the film \\ figure (for a modern picture) - is important but not dominant - there are techniques and the authors make a hand print from digital originals.
If you are in Moscow - there is such a wonderful man - Michael Kalamkarov (he has a blog in zhifom journal). And in St. Petersburg - Nahl Podolsky. They are both involved and the history and theory of photography, contemporary photography. And Michael - is itself a remarkable photographer.

gans, exactly :)

Glasha, well, it's understandable: the already very well known not to buy (because it is expensive), and unknown, because the unknown .. (and it is unknown whether known) ...

State of mind ... a capacity purse ... but priceless pictures I think free :)

murk :mad:

Haze that is what you have written in public communications:

... Parody the image of the artist-copyist, who, instead of innovation plagiarizes, born in controversy with the discourse of artistic eclecticism that emerged about 20 years ago. His birth was not predetermined by the internal problems of contemporary art, the main slogan of "on-mo" - "everything was! - Is journalistic rhetoric, intended for the masses, far from art ...

By the way, if you again allow the forum, show your collection of photos ... very interesting what the collector collects noart :)