Notice I did not argue)
In fact criticism hurt me hard.
Just pointed out the adequacy of the evaluation of specific figures.

Do not argue. And do not confuse.
but fall below their own strips do not want :)

I would say that good custom work for commercial projects to average-quality level. To enjoy the masses do not need artistic individuality and expressiveness, it can even be fatal (not everyone will understand), to mean something attractive for everyone.
In this commercial massmarket and exclusive art are fundamentally different.

And I also understand that as yet I have very little creative work.
We must work on that)
Actually, this is one of the reasons why want to go in the direction of art.
Even the custom work in this area are the individual character of the artist.

Second, an important reason. Massmarket products quickly die.
Even well-known products, which sell millions of copies, a year later no one needs, along with all the posters)
It's a shame to paint in a trash can for an order permanently, when the head is full of ideas)

Peter, a contemporary art? For example, a portrait of Einstein's formula type or there, a world map of snaps debris. It is possible to do some projects on your PC, if someone is inclined to this.

sur, The quality of images.
You did not even have enough to print on A4.

I would rather discern from the record "live" music.
The difference in the perception of a large, yes.
No entry will not give presence to the Philharmonic Orchestra.
But on the other hand, there is mediocre music, and it will not save performance in a "live", but there is one that touches a chord, even in the recording :)

Based on this theme - no need to :)
In the oil major disadvantage - the material. Canvas, paints, chemicals, everything requires a lot of space and more time for preparation and work.
But the same material, and a great advantage. Texture, lisirovochnye translucent layers, varnishes ... there can do that in the figure never wrought.
On the other hand, the figure does not need space, do not need to prepare canvas, wait until the layer dries, you can quickly sketch colors, virtually unlimited size ... etc.

In addition, there have voiced quite a few other advantages of real painting, before digital.

Added after 26 minutes
Since the copyright still no problems now.
Problems more appropriate investments for the future and the problems of perception.

As regards the latter agree!
While digital painting - simulates. This is bad.
You can easily identify strengths:
Graphics, Watercolors, Oils, Sculpture ...

But the highlight strong side of digital art is difficult.
ie There can be distinguished: easily replicated without loss of quality, faster to create.
but this disadvantage, both for the kind of exclusive art)

 Modern, studio recording, has become rather a competition programs, equipment and sound engineering talents.
 I have a friend, a studio sound engineer and we sometimes joke with him,
that, theoretically, I can only tell a story text, and he was turned into a song with my timbre golosa.No sing something, I do not know how !:)
 But here we do not have to deal with the same? After all, you have the opportunity to clean up every point.
 You might well know how to paint with a brush on the canvas, but certainly me personally, will never leave.

  Suppose I buy your electronic picture. How will it look? You give me a print out with your live signature and stick ?:) "And swear that have left a copy of ?:)
 
   Somehow it all from evil.

sur,
Can :) "The oil also can by the way, although there is and more complicated.
But you can edit as you like, but Repin not win on this.
The right to know how and where.
My pictures are at the level of my knowledge and skills.
By the force of performance they are similar and in pencil and oil, and digital ...

Painting on a canvas. We conclude copyright transfer agreement in 2 instance of the transfer of exclusive rights and the right to transfer them to third parties. If you need to assure the Notary.
If I give you a file, then pops up a new question.
You too can suddenly decide razmozhit work since :)
So what better to burn the file ;)
And still the weakest point in the scheme - the printers.
It was there, and might leak information.

Ate to compare your work with the painting, then there is nothing interesting. You have not invented anything new in art, your "canvas" can not clearly distinguish from the huge number of like them. I have called you an illustrator Denis Gordeeva, see his "Hobbit" - very much like fantasy. You paint what you were doing before long, using a new tool. That's it. From the standpoint kolektsionera-collector of art - it's almost worthless. But we can estimate in terms of interior decoration. But you really aspire to that?

It has long been known that the designer of the craft has always brought a more stable and higher earnings than the title of a free artist. Being unrecognized talent in search of his style, to finish even one line in a thick encyclopedia of world art - very difficult. In order to live like this, one must have a special mentality, a special fiber. You have to be an artist who least think about money. But the artist in you, I do not quite see. What you are doing, may well be a commercial success. But personally I do not care for two reasons:

1) artistic merit of the works presented
2) Digital base, you can copy and reduces individuality.

For me now the most urgent question of physical space, so I shoved the circumstances of the figure, the PC, .. I live poorer than Van Gogh, his bedroom was separate-but my studio - in the bedroom-(tired)
thinking at emalnye miniature switch-husband is not allowed to include oven,
So officially declare: Please accept the Association.
And bvrabanu. they say .. Let them say ...

Added after 20 minutes
And what you asta?

Added after 25 minutes
Marta, the work itself will teach!

The works presented in the first message to the Topeka fantasy have no relationship. Customized mainly for games, and themes from there.
Above the author's style will work.
But there is also a story, color, composition, idea in the work ... :)

I am glad that there are more positive assessment of my work from respected artists and gallery owners. True, but nevertheless, we must work with oil that it had some weight and price. Digital painting is interesting to watch or to order, but not to buy a wall or money to invest.

I am with my akademcheskim thin formation see in the great digital painting (supporting) the possibility for other kinds of art.
The most attractive for me it is that designs are not deteriorate, not get lost and do not take place and not have to make efforts for their preservation.

:)
Help me, than I can)
Digital painting is good for experimentation, rapid sketches.
Even with oil painting, it is useful search colors with it, do podmalevki and jot down the track, so you do not seek on the canvas, and know exactly what you're doing.

Besides, in my opinion, it is good for learning.
The laws of painting work the same.
However, in real painting does not avoid the "fight" with the material.
The young artist can not begin to write a lively yet learned how to mix colors, do not get rid of dirt on the canvas and palette.

Not fully understood the question.
Remaining money that the customer has paid under the contract ;)
If it is important to keep proof of authorship to the file, you can do something like this:
The original file remains in the author.
Customer transmitted file is truncated to 10-20 pixels on each side.
To view this is not essential, but is sufficient proof of authorship in the case, such as unauthorized use.

In general, use an image (print, multiply, sell) without the consent of the author is not so easy, you must have the rights to such use in the form of copyright agreement. Otherwise, great opportunity to run into. Blame is not difficult to prove :)

Added after 2 minutes
You beat my answer :)