![]() |
I personally liked the work. Horrors not found. Professionally and tastefully. Even if it is specific.
|
I think that in the recent work of Paul Feinstein (who had just looked brand new, which he posted today) there has been a qualitative shift - it's just wonderful job, I am delighted with them (the earlier work such a delight I have not summoned) - freedom of stroke and Plastic wealth, which he achieved, there are, at least to me, very rare.
We wish him every success! |
Вложений: 1
Цитата:
We have a discussion? Then it does not catch on a sharp word)))) Objectivity, the artist - uneven. All three presented array (conditional): portraits, the so-called : Anatomical, still lifes and other still-lifes are written with different tasks that the country has an adult author. Fact finding work in the "Jewish Museum" I was rather happy. From experience I can guess that this is not the same as for example, timing. Pictures of non-Jews there, probably not. I am not attracted monoculture. It is almost always - degeneracy, alas. Regarding the so-called "Wrapped" thought: when and where I could see it? If it were carefully spelled out, could be seen in 1978 at an exhibition of 20 of Moscow artists in the Little Georgian. Then it was terribly relevant and was driven head. "Fresh" - quite eclectic. But perhaps not be quite so fresh to publish? More like the other portraits, but ... 'll take the first finder hand portrait in 1960 ... Not shallow?))) |
Цитата:
|
Scary ..
Although professional! )) |
Цитата:
|
Часовой пояс GMT +3, время: 16:50. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.