On the cardboard, he wrote mostly in situ studies, which represents most of the work "period Murnau.
Regarding sales in the life:
such as the Salon Izdebsky (on the 1 st (1909-1910) -40 works to the 2-th Salon (1910-11) was brought and exhibited 54 works by Kandinsky), Kandinsky's work sold better, and more than all the other participants (who was there !!!).

Well this is a subject period? landscapes ultratsvetah ..

Here's looking at the recommended fross site
http://www.russianavantgard.com/index.html

I was amazed how many works by Kandinsky listed as the Tretyakov Gallery. And why could we not show them? Places there are quite enough .. strange ...

Seriy, the Tretyakov Gallery has a lot of, well, that even change exposure, something new appears in the halls.
But the empty walls, too, is, when on-site painting a piece of paper with text- At the exhibition or for the restoration .
Kandinsky, yes, in GTG-Composition VII and Lake.

Places, unfortunately not enough because a lot of space is confused exposition of contemporary art. For him, I think you need to create a new museum, but no curtain area of the museum, most of the funds which is in the reserves.

To all other does not build long-planned building of the museum on Kadashevskaya embankment. And they want to break the Crimean waterfront building CHA and the State Tretyakov Gallery. Shame!

Museums in Russia, as the whole culture does not need the State !!!

No need to break down and expel from the flea market-place called the Central House of Artists and send the entire building GTG then place exactly at all enough .....

It is also not an option. In Moscow, a very small exhibition space, if they close the CHA will be even smaller. In CHA often houses exhibitions. All is planned in advance. I think the most sensible thing is to build what was intended to Kadashevskaya waterfront plus new area for the State Tretyakov Gallery, next to the CHA. Place there is. This situation is a consequence of the policy pursued by the power of the whole perestroika period. Culture and science are destroyed on one side in favor of the interests of Western countries, but on the other side due to corruption of government at all levels.

Who is destroyed?
Addresses, names, appearance, ...

Ne mogli by vy razvit 'etu temu. Ia, chestno, bez smeha, ne ponimaiu etogo. Kakoi smysl zapadnym stranam unichtozat 'kul'turu i nauku Rossii?

Do you think that a country like the U.S. do not have their interests in Russia? Do you think that the U.S. does not finance the activities of foundations and individuals who are working on the collapse Rossiyskogo education and science? Do you think that the abundance of the Anglo-Saxon products on TV channels, this is a coincidence? You are so naive ?!...

Technology has long worked out and applied throughout the world! For example, remember Kosovo ...