Konstantin, The format in which is discussing these topics, normal.
No need to reinvent the wheel ..

Exit - to record specific instances of questionable conclusions. When the hands have information (and opinion falshak). In this episode itself is not a retelling of some abstract familiar (like, it is was), and provides a first-person. For example: bought a picture of something with such examination, signed by the expert such and such, but was falshak. That is, the argument should go ahead name. In fact on the site and done. There are already reviews and suspicious of experts can "punch" through the search.

And if the judge corrected (eg Petrov):)

That's it! What does "fix"? Repent, and from the shoulders down, - continues to operate as if nothing had happened. No responsibility, the court is not involved in it, and even if the drawing - all the lawyers would have canceled the "human factor": they say, every expert has a right to make mistakes.
I do not call for honest denigrated experts - everyone is innocent until the contrary is proved the court.
It should be easy to bring under one theme scans attribution to falshak with DOCUMENTED denial. There is a good idea to put the scanned documents with clearly false the signatures of known experts.
No do not blame anyone. The documents speak for themselves ...

The documents do not refute our fate! We can express your opinion about this rabote.Seychas all attack the all the experts, one good one bad, that there zamechen.Dokazat that the examination does not conform to the truth, is possible only through sud.Kazhdy people believe their expert, and they are including the successful degraded to a friend druga.Pravda who bought the work of the people and if lucky nedorogo.A all other purchases from dealers and collectors only rely on their intuition and knowledge.

Tsvetkova, 1959
 

Catalog Tsvetkova, although the signature may be made and later

Вложение 402145

"Refute" yes, probably.
You can express an opinion about "documents", why not?

[color="# 666686"]Added after 59 seconds[/color]
You can not prove, namely, to express their views on the examination.
If the elephant's cage prochtesh word "buffalo" does not believe your eyes. (c)

Good you Tsvetkova! And sign it.

Tsvetkova real, and it has already signed a marker 2000s years, she recently always delala.Budete sell predlozhite.S HC ..

I agree with you! Here on the forum a lot of serious collectors and dilerov.I opinion forum is important in the attribution of the painting.