What else can I add ... Of course, there exists the effect of national subjects , Baltic and possibly Azerbaijan .

By the way , Barvikha exhibited similar work before.

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 5 minutes[/color]
In Ulyanovsk, so it was . Bought from an exhibition in Moscow , sent here to KHUDFOND of Hudfonda back to the workshop.

Apologize for rudeness usually involuntary, if you intentionally, then of course, it is not necessary.
I do not write in the subject, but since you are addressing me, I answer to you here, I can in my topic, I know, do not mind.
I do not want to attribute their own words, I do not blame you saw the negative energy and "socialist realism, shit," I did not say that, perhaps unconsciously, you do feel that way.
Realism - normal art within certain limits, but when it is art .
 Since you're doing art, as far as I understood in its commercial aspect, the quality really be distinguished from social realism painting hudfondovskogo "Ches." Or do you think that once a person is able pririsovat hand to the body and the ears to the head, then all that it creates - is art?

P.S. A sequence of your message was this: the very thing which you have been sent this message directly to Cyril Syzransky, here, and see what came after that.
http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showpo...41&postcount=7
All I - to sleep.
 In order not to clutter up your theme flood can continue here tomorrow. http://forum.artinvestment.ru/showth...194851&page=53

What would attempt to set the style of writing of the works had been made, is still up against the socialist realism.
But he is also different social realism, a lot of talented work, and more consumer goods.

So, do you write! You "do not go and say goodbye, say goodbye and leave." <! - ~ 7 ~ ->

Added after 4 minutes
Dear, I said goodbye to you in this topic, you have to drum up another.
Dear, once again with the release of the text in bold:

Zarajara, for the future, one simple thing, if a person is not interested in your opinion on an issue, and he said to you about this, you should not be offended, just need to step aside and go about your business ... or move to another theme.


Almost all of these works (photos in my mailbox number 1, № 11) are taken from the album was released in the early 1980s after the exhibition at the Academy of Arts of the USSR, the reviewer of this edition - AM Gritsay (the album, the way it is and work, as well T.Nazarenko, N. Nesterov and others). Later this exhibition drove across the country, as well as exhibited in Italy and France.


"What-what-after <! - ~ 1 ~ ->" tomorrow Administatsiya "show" when recover my deleted message.

Good night! Sweet dreams!



Thanks, of course, but I'm in topics like "Let's talk for life" and "arbor" is not involved.

It's all so ... As there imitators, varying degrees of talent, etc.

By the way, for the most talented artists create custom work was a burden (which I write about the post-war time). But mediocre careerists this was a chance to break through. Hence the huge number of so-called "Socialist realism." Thematic painting, participation in exhibitions, censorship, art councils, and other ...

By the way, here's the Now the show goes [/URL].

Added after 19 minutes
Romanova, Baltic artist (man in black hats) ...

All this ottsenzureno, so once dead ...

I agree, "... because of the huge amount of repetitive faceless painting ..." which, given the link sergeynowo many have a negative opinion on the "socialist realism" as a whole,
 
but I note that almost all of the pieces of work (photos in my posts number 1, № 11) are taken from the album was released in the early 1980s after the exhibition at the Academy of Arts of the USSR, the reviewer of this edition - AM Gritsay (the album, the way it is and work, as well T.Nazarenko, N. Nesterov, etc.). Later this exhibition drove across the country, as well as exhibited in Italy and France.

Do you really believe that these works are "monotonous and featureless"?

When I created a theme, I proposed to measure and compare specific work, but not the whole socialist-realist painting.

Added after 16 minutes
Picture did not attach?

I called the authors of works of your message number 11.
Those who knew.

You are asking about the "manner, technique of writing". From this point of view, the vast majority of artists used exactly the same technique. Roughly speaking, like a worthless, so talented and equipment was alone. It is impossible to distinguish on grounds of "manners" any group of artists to come up with them a kind of definition that distinguishes them from other groups. There are small differences, but they are too vague to qualify for the independent term. Let's say you work shown number 5 is more technically accurate than the work number 10. Some of the more colorful, some - in a low-key scheme. But it will not extend the terminology.

To come up with some general name, not one, two talented artists who need a creative reservoir, need followers, imitators, even working in a certain "style" laid down "founder," there must be something quickly recognizable by many authors. In the Soviet art of the situation is quite different. On the one hand, there is a huge amount of pictures, looking at who can not identify the author, because they do not have a personality (even stranger), on the other hand, there are talented artists who watch as grain chaff exist by themselves. Some were too many others too little. Hence the problems with the terms.

Specifically shown your work is technically identical. About their artistic qualities can not say anything, one must look in real life.

1. Many of my articles in the network, but only since there were electronic versions of some publications. You can type in search Zara Ter-Hakobyan (I sign for her husband, that those on art, not to be confused with those of psychology). However, lately I write rarely, only about friends, once.
Scan the old ones? Yes, not all, but some have, efficient idea, maybe I will. Maybe I will lay out here is that in Russian.

2. I explained that I edit posts because you have to change the keyboard. And why should you in your posts are adding new pieces?

3. Topic moved beyond the discussion of your pictures (by the way, thanks in part to me), because my message is not addressed only to you, and even though they are your subject, I also do not wonder you like them or not.

This is not entirely true ...
There was also a gradation of technical and methodological , and other ... Who's who studied ...