Colleagues , well over the legal ignorance , I'm sorry ? To these questions there is a delegation of authority. In any public organization is the chairman , board, council , etc., and other members of the delegate to them the right to decide where to join the organization. Would be chairman of the union Ass - would not have come , but most of the architects behind the side voted. And who in the minority - may withdraw or accept their fate of the minority ( (( Democracy in Action )))
In general, whether it makes sense here to discuss relations within public organizations. The article about the creative unions Z. says all clear , I think.
And maybe that's enough on this topic offtopic ? Open the topic "Working ZAGRAEVSKY as chairman of the Union of Artists" and wash his bones as you want )))

I am here as I hear the word yuGideskaya illiteracy, so once I understand - these distinguished road on the way I do not :D>

But the members of the organization know where their organization is entered ?
The leadership of this organization has notified each of its members , for example, sending messages by email ? Or had some sort of meeting of the board of directors before joining ?
It's interesting.

Cyril, should definitely satisfy your interest? Well , today I have a good )) As for the PSC , all the statutory formalities have been complied with, without this in SF would not accept . I think with the Union of Architects and other organizations the same thing. In SF people are stupider than we with you, and are very particular about the formalities .

So maybe still on the art market talk? More offtopic here will not, even if someone else it will be very interesting)) ) Cyril - Last , who did not answer on the subject.

Oh, thank you!

This is not a medal but a medal - for sure!
 
:)>

What do you want to discuss ? Article?
So everything about it already wrote above . A discussion of entry into ... inspired to read it carefully (I wonder what became , in the train of thought made ​​such artists lend ).
There is no progress , so blah blah , then complete the Internet. Wrote probably not to forget. And if in all seriousness , wrote , and it can be - in fact saw the drawings serious :)>, then we can discuss just what "talent " is manifested in everything.

.. No guys, I'm not proud

without looking into the distance,

so I say - why should I order?

I agree to the medal .. :)>

Read the article . But it's not about the market and "thinking about the artistic life " ..
If you can ekstraktirovat the main provisions of (very briefly ) ...
"Brevity - the sister of talent " (this is Chekhov )?
NO, "Brevity is a very talent " ( I said it )
A remark "about the life of thin 80" , where the author sees the reason to 'spirituality' ..
Oh . Leave ! The reason for the difference in exchange rates.
In the late 80 foreigners bought EVERYTHING at ALL (art)
I remember myself at that time in Tallinn, where piles of realistic sketches uchebnyeh swept away in the cabin can be said immediately, but the Finns went with backpacks and trolleys (which are in Kiev called " Kravchuchkami ") .. So here the concept have changed. The market has been the demand was , the offer was .. The difference was such that diamond ring ( local production , new, in the company store was worth stolkozhe . How common form of baking a cake (Foreign ) I remember very well !

I would like to argue with you , but do not get with the money you are right. But spirituality and also was not it? Queues in a gallery were not kilometer from those who bought ! Remember that the Georgian woman was going on , or Millionshtchikov ? Tell me now, young - do not believe (((

Argue with that.
The information environment was different. Information flow is now much greater. And yet think of all the recent exhibition Levitan.
Then, because no books (perpetual deficit only ) or Internet options available did not exist.