Exposed rightly so.

In order not to clutter up the theme, will give a public explanation of the message (in profile).

Art is not a commodity ! This is its specificity. As only . becomes a commodity , it ceases to be art for some reason . This is all th . Art can be traded , but not touching the art itself . Trade means to buy and sell , and a memorable experience that it is the property of artists. Trade deal secondary , but very important.

Very exact words ! Art is not a commodity ! Product becomes a work of art .
If the artist has nothing to say , it is actually just " taking pictures ." Then the price of his work is comparable to the price of the photos .

K-Maler, and that this should be changed? The word " slander " in this case is not relevant . After all, these people are here for a purpose? This question I asked in the message to one of the participants. In some of those even a screenshot of this " slander."
That is, if you do not know. This theme is ready to discuss with any of the users in the LAN .

Pablo, you're a gossiper??

Prices of some photos up to several million dollars ... Here, too, we must be able to spin ( and artistic pictures , too ... )


And that's exactly ...

You are right. This is definitely not enough!
By itself, listing the names of worthy owning multiple works by the artist can raise the price of the author and illuminate it with the light and the list excellency sir ..
It's a decent maneuver if they own ..

It is an artificial construct .. refined idealistic thought.
".. buy and sell and do not forget that it is the property of the artists .. " - he bought the product of labor of the artist , title legitimately passed from hand to hand, the rest of the crystal spheres mystical and philosophical beliefs .
At a certain stage of life , the words of Benjamin Franklin "My better than ours ," justified <! - ~ 1 ~ -> .

Hans Gunner, on your note I have nothing to say .
Though, still, there is one thing I have expressed my point of view, is always right , and without all sorts of ulterior motives , and the like. For any of your phrase I am responsible , and I can say with confidence - what I have been saying this is only my statements . Do not judge me , I would be right in the end or not. In the sky will understand.
From SW.

artcol, Rakovsky - because I work in a university professor <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
Spell out - because I was trying to avoid the complicated terminology , but something could slip through an obscure art critics. So I am ready to explain .

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 4 minutes[/color]
I 'm afraid that 's not possible. Check for yourself . I am a professional promoter , but, for example , I was extremely uncomfortable to spin himself as a writer and novelist , as a result I just sold the manuscript in Vagrius , AST and EKSMO .

About the article . I pinned it in his diary. It is revealed , I checked. I would be glad if someone can help in some way .

[color="#666686 " ]Added after 10 minutes[/color]
Paul , if you 're painting , not Zarek from their subsequent sale , it's all the same goods. If the word offends , you can take it in quotation marks. Everything that is bought and sold , by definition, is a commodity .
If the art of writing with a capital letter, in general, not for specific art objects , I agree with you - not a commodity . Inspiration is not for sale , the manuscript - please. Copyright is not my <! - ~ 1 ~ ->