Pablo, why a separate issue? "How to promote the artist" ... artist promoted, successful, well-marketed - "star". By the way, in this magazine different curators and art historians are trying to dismantle the concept of "art star", "successful artist", "legend", "expensive artist", etc. Does the "star" of sales and events or is it something else? . I highly recommend. Although, by the art critics, art dealers and curators magazine tells nothing new. Rather, for beginners and enthusiasts <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

Yes, the artist did not have to. I think it is not necessary to invent the frame. You can interact with the public, but you can not. Easy to implement on paper (in a space on the canvas, the film) his world, the idea, the thought, just a beautiful moment, a condition emotion. Not caring about the audience ... The audience finds itself, will understand ... If she is not. If an artist is "inside" (<! - ~ 7 ~ ->). Then it is interesting to watch him hunt understand, feel, hear. He does not speak the language of the public, and forces her to learn her.

Everyone chooses his model behavior and career.

Education ... it all depends on the teachers. After all learning should be a period of "break-up". In any case, even the most severe teacher will not be able to break a lot of talent, he's exactly ripe. It's not even on the level of color ... pattern, and the individual level. Although, maybe I'm wrong, I do not know.

vodoleykina, you 're right , the artist did not have to , but no one says that he has something or not. And nothing about any part of the more . <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
You say : the implementation of ideas on paper , canvas ... For what? That is what I am saying.
About learning - yes. I believe that no matter how cool , and the teacher always tie your point of view, not to mention the way. So we can say that the biggest advantage is self-education. Everyone is yours, and you're sure of it by 100%<! - ~ 1 ~ ->

Perhaps already navayal so many " problems of the artist" who " has always been the same " in the " olive- brown burp ," which already sick of such realism throughout broken roads overgrown with birch trees on the background of the rickety fences ... however, as the number of toxic species of Venice with gondolas , terraces and bridges <! - ~ 1 ~ -> .

His need to bear ..

Guardian of dill,

I take it as a sketch, a workout eyes <! - ~ 1 ~ ->

For what? Just the desire to create. Is not it? Or is it something else ?



Sure bind , especially if the student is not " their grain ." If you can learn the techniques and technology has already been developed for years, for centuries , probably silly to refuse . This is only enrich the artist. " Nutro " ( <! - ~ 7 ~ -> ) all digest , filter , modify , and in general education will benefit. And if empty ... something useful to fill that void. Will know the basics of painting and drawing, that's good.

Strange you ... if a person wants to buy a romantic view of Venice with gondolas and bridges for interior decoration, why would he picture with the "I" of the artist?
Maybe it is the "I" to the bulb?

But vomiting something from this can.
Not necessarily wanting to buy.


PSDlya interior decorations are perfect reproductions on canvas by Giovanni Antonio Canal.

vodoleykina, if a person decides to draw, then it already is, as you say, the "kernel " <! - ~ 1 ~ -> Methods /technology tried and tested over the years , but not by the artist himself , and completely others. Therefore, there is kitsch . I suspect - it's out of laziness , unwillingness to look and see yourself, and to save time , again .
You can draw and Venice with gondolas , but to do so , as nobody does . And in this sense , and display of the world - show it from the point of view of the inherent personally artist. So did Van Gogh, Cezanne , and everything great , because before they did not do nothing.
 The task of schools - photographic art , one that has been demanded by 300-500 years ago. Well, when there were no pictures , no TV or etc. <! - ~ 1 ~ ->
It's about the surroundings. What about the inner self - is a deeper , there is even the notion of " art " is not entirely correct, IMHO. Even though these things sometimes turn into vsesmetayuschy on its way chaos , absurdity .

Even the fairest of monkeys ugly <! - ~ 1 ~ ->.

Yes, Bosch and Bruegel was known precursors photographers.
Or, for example , El Greco with more , so to speak , an approximation to reality.

Despite what her destiny.