What is the outlook there was no longer known . From Russian chronicles virtually nothing left, even in matters of history to think out more than read . And as a matter of vision ... Say never about anything as a Middle-earth .

Pro - paganism could believe that despite the absence of some written sources , a direct transmission saved . But it almost from the category of fantasy . In reality , this is not something that the ceremonies , even the Pantheon is not realized as such. And that was really , I think in general has sunk .

I guess that neo-paganism is simply a historical game with no real theological content . Write for 20 years lost in the centuries ... In the best case , a new faith .

Neopaganizm.
:D>

No , I'm not just about sex , I'm about morals , ethics and education in the broader smysle.V Russia is a writer Oleg Vereshchagin , read for Christians of course difficult , unusual , bizarre, but try vsetaki read his article , " Toys , " " Parenting warrior , " " Hello weapon ... " and then you 'll understand what I mean ...

Well , with respect to our current mores and modern morality , the pagans of ancient Greece and Rome were all perverts , so there is no head and share and not written by Russian writer Oleg Vereshchagin . :) >

I thought, you seriously.

Here am I trusting :)>.

Not, of course, the position of a comfortable, almost no written evidence, the ancient Greeks and Romans-deviants (and my.slavyane got to do with? "), So it's easier to flock to the priest to engage in cannibalism, eating their (voobscheto not even his, and the Jewish) God,
Yes vyklyanchivaniem him all the best.

Added after 3 minutes
The Communists, though the bastards were, but very true definition of Christianity gave-MRAC BESIE

And if the Communists ?
Obscurantism - a free translation into Russian of " obscurantism " ( Latin obscurans - beclouding ), signifying ideological mood , hostility toward science , culture and personal freedom . In Russia, the notion arose in the early XIX century .

What's the difference who first gave a correct definition. Yes, and the father of Prince Vladimir - Sviatoslav said a sacramental: the Christian faith - is ugly!

Rimidalv, we have freedom of religion and you can believe (or disbelieve) what (or whom) you want, but could you do this without offending the feelings of other believers, in this case the Christians?

Okay, all debate is over, leave.

So you do not read the original, but flooding The Internet. Therefore, the knowledge you have - are virtual.

This is not a word of Svyatoslav, and inserting a Christian chronicler of the Corinthians:

Olga-Zhivyashe same unto synom svoim Sviatoslav and his mother uchashet krestitisya, and brezhashe addition, no ear unto vnimashe, but If anyone hotyashe willed krestitisya not branyahu but rugahusya that. «Nevѣrnym more vѣra krestyanskaya urodstvo there» (bold-and-paste-First Corinthians. 1. 18: "For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness").
Translation:
-Lived as Olga, along with her son, Svyatoslav, and persuaded to be baptized, but he did not think to listen to this, but if someone was going to be baptized against their will, it is not forbidden, but scoffed at the fact. For "the Christian faith to unbelievers foolishness"; For the "do not know, do not understand those who walk in darkness, and they do not know the glory of the Lord," Make the heart of, hardly their ears hear and eyes see. "

There's a lot more instructive inserts from Scripture.

Such misguided nonsense You komprometiruete, kind of like their own, beliefs.

It's not kind of like, but my beliefs, and writing, which you worship, false from beginning to end.