Цитата:
Сообщение от iside
(Сообщение 1383151)
Castellana I like, incidentally. Delighted I bet not, but like it.
artcol, I do not know about you, but I have to somehow classify the actual art, so to speak, to hold a primary coarse filter - start sharing all of that what emotions I have is the product. Nausea, dizziness, feeling of filth, headache, fear :D
So Castellana me nothing of the sort is even interesting to watch at times, what he has invented a <!--~ ~ ->
|
And I did - to delight. Still, American Contemporary - it is another, and Castellana - a Christian Europe, it is closer in spirit. But other than that the Pope is nothing more I've seen (and some dinazavrikov), I'm afraid to spoil the impression :)
Thing is very strong. Frankly, analogs do not know.
By the way, as the Castellana and Hirst himself is not doing anything, just the concept.
Posted 3 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от Posav
(Сообщение 1383211)
It's not about price and content.
|
In Pelevin, in my opinion, in Chapayev and emptiness is a monologue of one of the heroes (banditstvuyuschego intellectual or vice versa) on the winds of change. Content in art - the prerogative of the artist, but perhaps it is the artist? Teach a man to do - he does. Robot. But still well done, I think he should now just be a masterpiece flowers.
|