We used this myth, both before and during the creation of the Golden Horde, and during its collapse its opponents. When the Roman-German yoke, and Especially when Peter Romanov Sia "Bulgar theory" used to justify the black legend of the "Tatar conquerors who came from the Far East in the XIII century, zelo helpful in rastatarivaniya and de-Russification (the" Europeanization ") of Russia.

Now, "Bulgar theory" used to justify the idea of "Bulgar-Tatar" separatists of the "independent Bulgaristane-Tatarstan", trying to separate the part of the Tartars (supposedly "Bulgars") from the rest of the Tatars of Russia-Eurasia and the elimination of the Tatars as a single nation with ethno-political map of the world. All this, according to the "agents of influence" of certain forces, should also contribute to the weakening and collapse of Russia. Since separated by dissolving the Tatars - a monolithic ethnic group (people) who lives across Russia, some people will be much easier to "divide" and its territory into many smaller "independent" quasi-state.

But as untenable and sewn with white thread, "Bulgar theory" was not accepted by the Tatars, remembered from his ancestors his true past.

Complete failure "theory of the origin of Bulgar Tatars" is visible in the fact that the ancient Bulgars, made his way to the Volga region somewhere in the VII-VIII century, leave en masse from the Volga region much earlier, "the invasion of the Tatars" - roughly VIII-IX centuries. - And since then, as we know, and stay beyond the Danube, still called - "Bulgaria". As well as "Madjars - Hungary (their name was in Persian - bashgird). And the only areas in which to IX century, inhabited by about - among other peoples and tribes - the ancient Hungarians and Bulgars, have kept their names as place names - "Bulgar", "Majar (Meshera, Mishәr"), "Bashgird" (Bashkort "," Bashkortostan "). Just for example, as the name of Siberia (from the name of an ancient people "Savirien).

Remaining in a small number of Hungarians and Bulgarians were assimilated by the local and outsiders Turks arriving from the south and south-east, gradually, V-IX centuries. And even earlier in the Volga, the Urals and in the steppe and forest steppe of the Volga to the Black Sea. The main dominant ethnic group among the conglomerate narodtse and tribes of aliens Turks - kypchaks-polovtsev - and had a separate ethnic group (the people) and self-titled "Tatar."

Let us deliberately confused by the official historians-Western origin of the name and self-known to all of old people "Tatars" - is primarily a self once mighty people, that is, the Tartars called themselves from time immemorial "Tatars", "Tatar people "- as to the era of the Mongol-Tatar" and "in the era of the Mongol-Tatars, as well as after - until now.

Does the name "Tatar" from the Turkic word "Totaro" ("o" is pronounced close to "a") - means: "Those who can hold (contain) in order" - such as a country.
The name "tartare" - in every way fleece official "historians of the Tartars", along with other negative "declination" (and poor "translation-interpretation) of the name" Tatars "- has a beginning with the publication of a Catholic Englishman Matthew Paris (1240's) , eerily frightened, like all his fellow Catholics, Ordyntsev onslaught on Western Europe. This was done in retaliation for the Horde crusades in Russia, - in order to discharge the same trips were no longer recur. Since Matthew "wrote as heard, it was forced to write in English is« Tartar », as in English, if you write" Tatar ", then we obtain by reading:" teytar. Well, after the readers and successor of St. Matthew (yes, and like himself - can, and who suggested) and develop the theme of "interpreting" Tartar "Matthew as" messengers of hell, "etc.

Data eastern sources, for some reason little-known public show Tatar (not a "Bulgar" and "kypchaks-polovtsev", namely, the Tatars) long before the "Mongol-Tatar invasion" - as in Central and West Asia and in Eastern Europe. And also on events from ancient times (from about VIII century), "Kinship Chyngyz Tatar Khan with Kipchaks. However, Western sources, and blurts out that the Tatars and the "Tatar invasion in the XIII century. "Living on land where they live Kuma - ie kypchaki-Polovtsy.

Now we discover something previously hidden and little known today about Chyngyz Khan, his kinsmen and associates, so a "Mongol-Tatar invasion and yoke":

In the middle of the XIX century, the Russian academician VP Vasiliev, who spoke Chinese, Manchu, Khalkha languages, with the departure to China within 10 years studying the little-known historical sources, hidden from the "prying eyes" the writers of the official version of "History of the Mongols," we know from textbooks. At the same VP Vasilyev said that the Chinese Ming dynasty by overthrowing the end of XIV century, during the 20-year war power of the Mongol-Tatars in the eastern part of Eurasia, "was his" History of the Mongols, and therefore the history of the origin of Genghis Khan and his government is hidden in the darkness. " But still, numerous reliable information about Chyngyz Khan and his Tartars, and their associates.

In Russia and Eurasia, as partly known to the Romanov rule Ordynskaya dynasty - is Chyngyz Khan, his fellow tribesmen and their allies, the political community which consisted of representatives from different nations, mainly from the Tatars and other Turks, but also from Russian, was called "Mongols" (or, in other words, Horde).

The name "Mongol» is derived from the Old Tatar words: "Maenge (Mәңge) - which means" eternal ", and" Maengel (Mәңgel) - "Forever", this word was chosen as the title of his Power Chyngyz Khan and his associates. Thus the name "Mongol" was not originally an ethnic name of a tribe or people, and was named a political community, such as "Soviet."

In principle, it was explained VP Vasil, but his information was, in fact, hidden from the public. Version of the name "Mogul", found in some authors, due to a lack in their own language (letter) back consonants "n" ("ң"), the Latin alphabet - "ng". The British, for example, still pronounce the word quite close to the original: "Mongol".

While he Chyngyz Khan and his own people were called and self "Tatars", and "did not speak the language, which we now call" Mongol "(V. Vasiliev). and Tatars Chyngyz Khan lived far to the west of those places where they were "determined" the writers of the history of the Mongols. "

In addition to race medieval Tatars were not any "Mongoloids" (type Khalkha Mongols or Chinese), and were "Europoids Oriental type (LNGumilev) - about the same as the modern Tatars in the majority and Russian Tatar origin. For example: "The Chinese are naturally beardless, and the Tartars, Saracens (Persians) and Christians (Europeans) - with beards," explained the difference between Chinese, "Mongoloid" from Representatives of the European races the Italian Marco Polo, who lived among the Tatars, descendants of the tribesmen and Chyngyz- Khan's 17 years old.
Note that all information, Academician VP Vasilyeva coincide with the set of data from historical sources from different times and peoples from different areas of Eurasia, including the Tatar.

Romanov-Westerners, following the capture of power in the country as a result of the Troubles, arranged by their patrons by the Jesuits, the Catholics in the early XVII century. Had to be in every way "discredit" Ordyntsev in order to prevent them an opportunity to return to power. To this end, in the writings of foreign advisers, "the history of Russia, the Tatar Horde presented a" semi-wild nomadic conquerors. " And their fellow Russian princes - "accomplices of wild conquerors of the Tatars," he says, "such as the Tatars, despots against their people." For example, NM Karamzin wrote that the faction of the Romanovs, the last Westerners hate Horde Tsar Boris Godunov, namely, "for belonging to a tribe Mogul" - in this case istoriosochinitel-Westerner had in mind Godunov belonging to a community media ideology Mongol-Ordyntsev.

The representatives of contemporary Russian Official (and still essentially Western-) historical science, seems to never go beyond, certain basic postulates, Romanov has given foreign specialists on draw up a "History of Russia" and "promoted" through the centuries by their followers. Despite the fact that in this history-theory of the main ethnic groups (peoples) of Russia-Eurasia, both Russian and Tatars, especially their fellow Turks, in the role of "backward and non-historical peoples," "eternal enemies" and (or) "slaves "each other at different periods of history.

Therefore, it is Russian and Tatars in the first place, one must objectively look at their overall true story - though critically evaluating the postulates-stamps the Romanovs and the "oriental" historians who denigrate our ancestors, are opposed, and oppose them in the past - in his historical works - in order to oppose us in the present and future. This was done in order to successfully install the "Romano-German yoke" (NS Trubetskoy) in the XVII century, and have the opportunity to continue to influence us with his "advice and direction" - thus successfully continue this yoke.

-Western Historians silent on the participation of many nobles and educated people including the Russian in the affairs and wars of the Tatars, "at least twenty years before the" invasion of the Tatars in Russia ". hush official historians as the presence of the Tatars in Eastern Europe and Western Asia long "before the conquest of the Tatars." While there are substantial information that the Tatars (not "Polovets, namely the Tartars), long before the" Mongol-Tatar invasion, "have participated in the fighting on the side of the Russian princes, uniters, seeks to establish law and order in Russia, and, accordingly, peace and prosperity for its people.

We note one important point, concealed historians Westerners (and "Easterners" - afraziytsami and Chinese). According to the research of Academician VP Vasiliev, Tatars led Chyngyz Khan is from the west come to the war in response to the aggression and the Tangut kingdom Tszinskoy Empire (north and north-east of modern China), which "every three years, sending troops far north-west to destroy and plunder the Tatars . That is, the Tatars Chyngyz Khan - in order to coerce the world irrepressible eastern neighbors - are making their "invasion" on them by the East Turkestan, Altai region, Volga region, etc.

And here is essentially that: medieval Tatars, the native people Chyngyz Khan, as evidenced by many of the details of historiography, in principle, have nothing in common with the semi-wild nomads, especially the ancestors of the Mongols Khalkha. In Tatar khan Chyngyz "language, customs, material and spiritual culture were similar to the Turkic Uighurs of East Turkestan (VVBartold)," the people of growers, merchants and craftsmen (LNGumilev). According to many credible information from the world historiography of different times, medieval Tatars still "before the era of Genghis Khan built the city with high culture, led a transcontinental trade, possessed skills in a major river shipping, metallurgy, arable farming and in every way" patronized agriculture. " Information about this and try to hide from the public's pro-Western and pro-Chinese historians.

such examples in the world historiography weight, but they are in every way "cost" (in fact, hidden from public) pro-Western and pro-Chinese historians, among whom the official historians of professionals, unfortunately, the majority.

We note particularly that the relationship of the Horde and Russia, as well as the relations of Russian and Tatars on the political space Jochi Ulus and Muscovy in the XIII-XVI centuries were quite different than that described by historians and describe the pro-Western. Namely (in a nutshell "): the basic opponent Horde (Russian tsars and princes, and the Tatar khans and MPD), and their peoples during the reign Ordynski in Muscovy-Russia was precisely the Catholic West. And the influence of the political organization of the Great Horde, and he created the State Power Mongol promoted economic and cultural development as Russia and countries of other peoples of Eurasia, were part of a federation "Eternal Shire of the Great Horde.

But after learning and understanding of these key points have a different picture begins to take shape the history of the Fatherland, a non-contradictory, but it does not correspond to the "theory of the Tatar invasion, conquest and the yoke" and other tenets of pro-Chinese and pro-Western historiography.

Questions (topics), above, thoroughly worked out and dealt with in the books of the pupil and follower, LN Gumilev, Tatar historian GR Enikeeva Crown Horde Empire "(Moscow," Algorithm ", 2007) and" Memories of a black legend "(Moscow," Medina ", 2009).

Ghali Enikeev leads in their books information from historical sources and works of historians and researchers of different ages and different nations, is largely obscure, and compares them with each other and with the precepts of the official historiography, on the relevant links to sources.

On books, GR Enikeeva see an article, review the honorary leader of the Tartar Nobility Assembly (Majlis Tatar MPD (biyev)) M.Sh. Mamleeva "Discover its history." http://tartareurasia.ucoz.com/publ/1 There is a review of Doctor of History, DM Iskhakov on the first work (the book), GR Enikeeva "Genghis Khan and the Tartars: Myths and Realities." On the basis of and in the development of the content of this work and subsequent written two books Enikeeva GR, notwithstanding that the slightly higher.

The contents, cover and clarifications to the cover and book chapters, GR Enikeeva "In the footsteps of the black legend" here: http://tartareurasia.ucoz.com/publ/knigi_enikeeva_gr/5

On the cover of a medieval portrait Chyngyz Khan, reproduced, taking into account information Tatar historical source, "On the genus Chyngyz Khan" and other information from the world of historiography - perhaps with a somewhat unexpected appearance of many (non-Chinese and Khalkha), with blue eyes and bushy red beard ".