There is no realism. It is idle imagination. There is a realistic method that covers all the arts of all time. Courbet was a realist, which is in opposition to a bourgeois nymphs began to draw the workers and ordinary people that is truth of life. Zytem were the Impressionists and Van Gog.Obuchenie art of painting includes the ability to draw and there is no better way to learn how to copy the samples, along with work from life on the principle of simple to complex. That does not mean that later life should be to repeat these lessons, but instead pushing them to find their own way, original style and direction. Continue forward talent, and if it does not go run the compilation and so you know tricks.
Big mistake to consider that if you make abstraction immediately becomes an original, but in this way is even harder to be original and an example of what Hurst and three other four names. Others simply suite emphasizing "greatness" of these "peaks".
Added after 8 minutes
Цитата:
Сообщение от KaterinaMN
(Сообщение 1040522)
Artem, then after a few of the other conversation going. Originally it was a question that contemporary art, unfortunately, almost forgotten technique of drawing and painting, in favor of "expression" of authors. Moreover - contemporary art in the West (and may be our already) his understanding - and painting - are often diametrically opposite positions.
|
You just do not know very well that "Western art". It is not self-expression are ordinary weak, and in search of its original path. This is well written by Matisse. |
