At the soap-Tar, the soap!
 

No self-respecting art historian or art dealer has no right to criticize, just criticize the paintings of famous artists. Not to my taste, yes, it is permissible, but not more. And then, if his opinion was asked. Admire, admire more:)
For the biologist does not favor one or another animal. The family cat, bad smells, flies-nonsense, but the snail's something that must be!: Eek:

  A good or bad writing Vasnetsov and Shishkin (it is his schedule, interesting looking), all the world is appreciated. And I think many people would want something from Vasnetsov in his collection.

And the name (pseudonym) Katya Tar remarkable. : DOchen recalls the late singer chanson Katya Ogonek.

Probably work of any person who can draw takes place to be.
I think that this situation should work natural selection.
And when such as this tar brainwashed society, it is not correct.
It's no secret that many do not receive recognition during his lifetime. But it did not leave them unnoticed. Moreover, they were recognized genius!
And time is a great healer and will put everything in its place.
And as such tar will not break nails, I may say so, this painting will find its place in the dustbin of history!
And she does not suffer kaprofiliey case?

Interestingly, while critics in the West faced with such questions "Now the question is: Do not you think it's time to somehow separate the art from the freedom of expression?".

[color="# 666686"]Added after 3 minutes[/color]
Wash before we tried not to discuss the topic at a similar level (such as would not want to).

gans, you probably understand the sarcasm of my question?

It's quite obvious of course, but it seems to me that the forum loses, when the discussion of significant characters in an interview with the contemporary art scene, or kontemporari all boils down to multi-voiced "is not art is not art."

Although the question I asked with a share of the sarcasm, but still some kind of doubt regarding its tendencies I have appeared!
Well, what normal person would be a nonsense for DH

In the West, critics - adepts of modern art in response to such questions tend to speak about a conspiracy of reactionaries:)

Class!
Well there are reactionaries, and they can come to an agreement!
And who conspires with someone in our parts?

The exhibit "Artist's shit" turned out to be gypsum
Objects of the Italian artist Piero Manzoni (Piero Manzoni), entitled "Merda d'Artista" ( "Artist's shit") - closed jars with labels - were filled with plaster. The mystery of the most famous art-provoking 1960 paper Correre della Sera, cited by The Times, opened Bonalumi Agostino (Agostino Bonalumi), a close friend of the late Manzoni.: D http://lenta.ru/news/2007/06/12/manzoni /

Firebird,
"No self-respecting art historian or art dealer has no right to criticize, just criticize the paintings of famous artists."

is why?


A good or bad writing Vasnetsov and Shishkin (it is his schedule, interesting looking), all the world is appreciated.

thought Mrs. Tar these respected painters not give novelty. I do not quite understand why they are all so excited.


"And the name (pseudonym) Katya Tar remarkable. It resembles the late singer chanson Katya Ogonyok.
Bravo. ry nice: mad:

strange that no one was surprised that there is no God (according to Tar). but it somehow, by his own admission, is thinking about the moral and spiritual role of art. interesting as it does?